Every Friday we share one non-obvious insight from your favorite creators in our newsletter.
Sept. 2, 2022

The 10 Mistakes Orgs Make with Thought Leadership Marketing, with Bill Sherman

In this replay episode, Dan Sanchez talks with Bill Sherman who is the COO of Thought Leadership Leverage. 
Here are the mistakes discussed:
Lack of a clear exec champion
The new Head of Thought Leadership is unclear on their role / goals.
The new...

The player is loading ...
B2B Growth
In this replay episode, Dan Sanchez talks with Bill Sherman who is the COO of Thought Leadership Leverage. 
Here are the mistakes discussed:
Lack of a clear exec champion
The new Head of Thought Leadership is unclear on their role / goals.
The new Head of TL feels the new role is not a promotion ("being sent to Siberia")
The Head of Thought Leadership doesn't understand the business strategy and goals.
Other departments get into turf wars over activities ("we do Thought Leadership too!")
The Head of Thought Leadership tries to do it all -- instead, the Head of TL should *curate* Thought Leadership
The Head of Thought Leadership doesn't build allies in other departments
Thought Leadership is seen as something by/for the elite (only the CEO).
The org gets impatient for results.
The org tries to measure success by the wrong standards (e.g. content marketing)
Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:03.960 Today on B two B growth, we are sharing a featured conversation from our 2 00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:08.919 archive, with over two thousand episodes released. We want to resurface episodes worth 3 00:00:09.039 --> 00:00:12.599 another listen. Before we jump in, just want to say I would love 4 00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:15.720 to connect and hear from you on Linkedin. You can search Benji walk over 5 00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:18.839 there and that's a great place to also interact with sweet fish and B two 6 00:00:18.839 --> 00:00:32.880 B growth. All right, let's jump into today's featured conversation, conversations from 7 00:00:32.920 --> 00:00:39.920 the front lines and marketing. This is B two B growth. Bill. 8 00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:42.439 I wanted to start off with asking you like, how did you even get 9 00:00:42.479 --> 00:00:45.759 into this topic, like how did this become a focus for you? Well, 10 00:00:45.799 --> 00:00:49.280 if you ask most people how they get into thought leadership, they sort 11 00:00:49.320 --> 00:00:53.679 of usually answer they got there accidentally, and my story is very much the 12 00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:59.920 same. I would describe myself as a practitioner of this thought leadership field as 13 00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:04.840 something unplanned. I did school and undergraduate in English and theater. I was 14 00:01:04.920 --> 00:01:10.519 doing organizational consulting and I thought I was going to be a consultant in organizational 15 00:01:10.519 --> 00:01:15.400 transformation and then I had a c level executive large company the early two thousands 16 00:01:15.680 --> 00:01:18.840 who said Hey, I wrote this business book. It got on the cover 17 00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:22.359 of Fast Company. People are asking me what to do with it and how 18 00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:26.120 they can apply the ideas. Can you help? And from there I stumbled 19 00:01:26.159 --> 00:01:32.480 into a sort of a word of mouth referral where various exacts would go, 20 00:01:32.959 --> 00:01:36.920 Oh, you wrote a book, Go talk to Bill. And it was 21 00:01:36.959 --> 00:01:42.560 a sideline for a while and but it became a passion and really what I 22 00:01:42.599 --> 00:01:46.400 saw is the through line of my career is taking ideas through scale. Right, 23 00:01:46.719 --> 00:01:51.079 how do you take an idea this scale within the organization or beyond the 24 00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:57.200 organization? And so, since it's been my full time focus, probably one 25 00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:00.159 of my favorite things about marketing and why I'm even attracted thought leadership at all, 26 00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:04.400 is because I want to see the good ideas fly, you know, 27 00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:07.040 you want to see the good things get out there, and usually it just 28 00:02:07.079 --> 00:02:09.639 needs a little marketing ferry dust to thought leadership is usually the kind of marketing 29 00:02:09.639 --> 00:02:15.319 you put into ideas. Um, the usually those ideas come with stories, 30 00:02:15.360 --> 00:02:19.360 come with people and characters, Um, and thought leaders behind those ideas. 31 00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:22.520 So, uh, I certainly no. That's one of the reasons why I 32 00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:25.400 got into and it sounds like you fell in love with the topic for a 33 00:02:25.439 --> 00:02:30.280 similar reason, trying to get those ideas, trying to give legs two ideas. 34 00:02:30.039 --> 00:02:35.360 But a number of people try to do that and fail. So as 35 00:02:35.439 --> 00:02:42.000 you've gone from Organization Organization, have provided like coaching and services around helping people 36 00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:46.520 do thought leadership better. What are you have? I know you sent me 37 00:02:46.560 --> 00:02:50.479 over ahead of time. What are like the ten biggest mistakes you see people 38 00:02:50.520 --> 00:02:54.240 make is they try to go into this thought leadership marketing endeavor. So let's 39 00:02:54.280 --> 00:03:00.080 start with how the thought leadership function gets created. And I described thought leadership 40 00:03:00.120 --> 00:03:07.439 as a function separate from content marketing or executive communications or even classical B two 41 00:03:07.439 --> 00:03:10.560 B marketing, which I know is the focus here. It's a tool in 42 00:03:10.599 --> 00:03:15.199 the subset. And so the first question is who's going to be the executive 43 00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:20.199 champion? That might be the head of marketing, that could be someone in 44 00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:23.479 ops. I know of large organizations where the champion is the C I o 45 00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:29.080 who said we need to do thought leadership. So there's no consistent role. 46 00:03:29.159 --> 00:03:32.599 But step number one. If you don't have an executive champion who understands what 47 00:03:32.680 --> 00:03:36.879 this is, you're going to struggle. And does it need to be a 48 00:03:36.960 --> 00:03:39.120 champion and or does it need when you say executive champion. Does it need 49 00:03:39.159 --> 00:03:44.599 a champion on the C suite? It should be either the VP or the 50 00:03:44.639 --> 00:03:47.400 C suite, someone who, at the end of the day, is willing 51 00:03:47.479 --> 00:03:53.360 to invest the time and effort in something which is not going to produce immediate 52 00:03:53.400 --> 00:03:57.479 results in sixty days. You're standing up a business function when you're setting up 53 00:03:57.479 --> 00:04:00.319 ahead of thought leadership and you have to have some patients. So is it 54 00:04:00.400 --> 00:04:05.400 usually the CMO or is it usually whoever is in charge of the whoever is 55 00:04:05.439 --> 00:04:10.280 the head of the subject matter experts at that organization? It depends. So, 56 00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:12.560 as I said, I can think of C I o s who have 57 00:04:12.680 --> 00:04:16.040 championed it. I can think of CEOS who have championed it. It depends 58 00:04:16.079 --> 00:04:21.160 on who gets it and realizes this is a distinct thing. Nobody has taken 59 00:04:21.399 --> 00:04:28.160 really yet a class and thought leadership at B school, and so it's it's 60 00:04:28.199 --> 00:04:32.279 more someone gets the idea that they need to do something different to deepen a 61 00:04:32.360 --> 00:04:39.959 relationship with customers or to drive conversations when you're not in a sales mode, 62 00:04:40.279 --> 00:04:44.160 or influence how people think and act and they say, Oh, what can 63 00:04:44.199 --> 00:04:47.079 we do? Well, that's the leadership. Great. How do we stand 64 00:04:47.079 --> 00:04:51.519 that up. So there we go. Number one, lack of clear executive 65 00:04:51.800 --> 00:04:57.839 champion. Who is that at your organization? What's number two? Number two 66 00:04:58.160 --> 00:05:03.319 is ahead of the leadership. WHO's unclear on the role? And so number 67 00:05:03.319 --> 00:05:06.720 two and number three go together. But let's talk about the role of the 68 00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:12.879 head of thought leadership. Many organizations don't tag someone and say congratulations, your 69 00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:15.480 full time head of thought leadership. There are some big organizations that are doing 70 00:05:15.519 --> 00:05:21.519 that now, but many cases it's a percentage of your time and you've got 71 00:05:21.519 --> 00:05:26.040 to make sure that that person knows what you're asking them to do, they 72 00:05:26.160 --> 00:05:30.360 understand how it fits what what they do sevent of the time and it has 73 00:05:30.399 --> 00:05:35.600 to be tied to how they're motivated and evaluated and compensated. Because if at 74 00:05:35.639 --> 00:05:40.759 the end of the year those were end handle thought leadership, but it's not 75 00:05:40.839 --> 00:05:46.040 tied to performance, it doesn't get done period right. So usually what you 76 00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:49.040 need to do is the person who's sponsoring the idea, the idea, whether 77 00:05:49.079 --> 00:05:51.839 it's on the c suite or the VP of marketing, says hey, I 78 00:05:51.920 --> 00:05:57.120 want you to handle thought leadership and usually there's a moment where the person looks 79 00:05:57.519 --> 00:06:00.519 at the end sort of has a blank eyed look and is what's that and 80 00:06:00.639 --> 00:06:04.959 what does that mean for my career? And that leads us to point number 81 00:06:04.959 --> 00:06:10.639 three. Alright, so moving on to that point. Yeah, so the 82 00:06:10.639 --> 00:06:15.279 head of thought leadership needs to see it as an opportunity because, rather than 83 00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:19.839 being sent to Siberia, if they think that they're going to be exiled and 84 00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:24.920 you know this isn't an opportunity for growth for them, then they're gonna go. 85 00:06:25.079 --> 00:06:27.879 What didn't I do well in the organization? Why are you putting me 86 00:06:27.959 --> 00:06:32.199 in this cubby hole over here that's brand new, has no infrastructure and I'm 87 00:06:32.240 --> 00:06:38.000 sweating to try and get time, budget, resources and help right. They've 88 00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:41.759 got to understand it's important. And one example I can give head of thought 89 00:06:41.839 --> 00:06:46.199 leadership at a major financial institution. He had the talk, had a sea 90 00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:48.360 level exact come in and say, and he was head of strategy, came 91 00:06:48.399 --> 00:06:51.040 in and said we want you to run thought leadership and he's like, is 92 00:06:51.079 --> 00:06:56.879 my career being sidelined? What's going on right? Thinks about it at home 93 00:06:57.279 --> 00:07:04.560 and then agrees to take the all and within about four months is working on 94 00:07:04.639 --> 00:07:11.639 a project where the head of the company is speaking after the president in the 95 00:07:11.639 --> 00:07:16.519 West wing of the White House. Okay, and so with that that individual 96 00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:20.319 comes into the head of thought leadership's office and goes, yeah, I'm used 97 00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:26.800 to big opportunities all the time, this one's special. Let's make sure we 98 00:07:26.879 --> 00:07:30.879 do it right. And so you have to when you're standing up that person 99 00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:34.439 into the role, you have to convince them this is good for their career 100 00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:40.079 as well as good for the organization. I find thought leadership. I imagine 101 00:07:40.079 --> 00:07:44.439 this probably gets handed the most to content marketers, or gets handed often to 102 00:07:44.519 --> 00:07:47.319 content marketers. Where who do you who? Usually it's often content marketers. 103 00:07:47.399 --> 00:07:51.480 So if you were to map where people come from, is heads of thought 104 00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:57.680 leadership. Content marketers tend to be accidental. They stumble into thought leadership and 105 00:07:57.720 --> 00:08:00.800 start doing it and someone in marketing says, I don't know what you're doing 106 00:08:00.839 --> 00:08:03.240 over here, but do more of it because it seems to be working right. 107 00:08:03.800 --> 00:08:09.240 Others get recruited in. Executive Communications is another path. Strategy is another 108 00:08:09.319 --> 00:08:15.279 path. I've seen people in public policy get handed a head of thought leadership 109 00:08:15.319 --> 00:08:20.319 function as well, sometimes from the line sales. Engineering also gets this as 110 00:08:20.360 --> 00:08:26.720 well because they understand the customer and they've engaged with the customer sometimes you'll see 111 00:08:26.720 --> 00:08:31.759 it from an evangelist role as well, especially in tech. It seems to 112 00:08:31.799 --> 00:08:39.080 me like if anybody's in content marketing, this is a promotion. Essentially you've 113 00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:43.279 been handed like the court. I don't know, the more I've learned about 114 00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:46.960 thought leadership marketing, the more I'm like, Oh, this is like thought 115 00:08:46.080 --> 00:08:50.879 leadership, this is like content marketing on steroids. This is essentially like a 116 00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:54.399 level above content marketing. This is like, well, they do different places, 117 00:08:54.639 --> 00:08:58.120 right. I mean you can do a lot of things abroad content marketing. 118 00:08:58.120 --> 00:09:01.679 I've done I've done content barries for Seo reasons that aren't thought leadership marketing 119 00:09:01.679 --> 00:09:05.919 and I get lots of traffic from it. Right ways to do it. 120 00:09:05.960 --> 00:09:09.559 But at the same time I'm like thought leadership marketing goes it's harder to make, 121 00:09:09.000 --> 00:09:13.000 takes a little bit more talent to be able to organize it and pull 122 00:09:13.039 --> 00:09:16.080 it out to people and all that kind of stuff, but it's so much 123 00:09:16.120 --> 00:09:20.279 more powerful and so much more profitable. Well, especially if you understand the 124 00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:24.159 goals of your organization. You have to understand what the business is trying to 125 00:09:24.200 --> 00:09:28.919 achieve, not only today but where it's going in the future, and you 126 00:09:28.960 --> 00:09:33.440 have to also understand the landscape of your business. So the person who's serving 127 00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:37.960 that role of head of thought leadership has to understand the organization vertically as well 128 00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:41.840 as horizontally. It's big, big shoes to fill if somebody asked to do 129 00:09:41.919 --> 00:09:45.840 it, but I don't know. I think it is a huge opportunity for 130 00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:48.720 lots of people who get to get or invited into it. Let's move on 131 00:09:48.720 --> 00:09:54.320 to number four. The what's the fourth mistake you see companies run into. 132 00:09:54.799 --> 00:10:01.320 So the fourth mistake is that the organization doesn't set goals that are aligned with 133 00:10:01.399 --> 00:10:05.919 business goals. And so I can give an example. We're going to put 134 00:10:07.000 --> 00:10:09.039 out a piece of thought leadership. It could be a white paper, it 135 00:10:09.039 --> 00:10:13.879 could be a podcast, it could be a journal, it could be a 136 00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:18.600 conference, but they're not tying it back to the business goals. And so 137 00:10:18.799 --> 00:10:24.200 what happens is the asset or the event gets the focus rather than the outcome. 138 00:10:24.480 --> 00:10:30.840 And you've got to think about who are we trying to reach and if 139 00:10:30.879 --> 00:10:35.639 we reach them, what are they going to do? And so the goals, 140 00:10:35.679 --> 00:10:39.360 and we'll get into this in terms of measure and success, have to 141 00:10:39.399 --> 00:10:43.240 be thought about upfront, because this is not like content marketing, and one 142 00:10:43.240 --> 00:10:46.960 of the ways that I distinguish it is, you know, you can use 143 00:10:48.080 --> 00:10:50.320 content marketing myotrics and say, Hey, I got all these likes and I 144 00:10:50.360 --> 00:10:54.240 got all these impressions, Pat Yourself on the back and that's good. In 145 00:10:54.320 --> 00:10:58.279 thought leadership that may not be good because if they're not the right audience, 146 00:11:00.039 --> 00:11:03.320 you failed. So what's specific of enough of a goal, because I think 147 00:11:03.320 --> 00:11:07.000 there's many shapes and sizes of goals and usually when people are coming to me 148 00:11:07.039 --> 00:11:11.440 and saying, because I get to consult with customers, we're walking through our 149 00:11:11.440 --> 00:11:13.559 podcasting process, and ask him like, okay, so what's the main goals 150 00:11:13.600 --> 00:11:16.600 of your podcast? Thought leadership is often one of it's one of the top 151 00:11:16.639 --> 00:11:22.960 three goals. So we want to produce content to have better thought leadership. 152 00:11:22.279 --> 00:11:26.080 You know, they want to be seen as the expert. It's almost a 153 00:11:26.120 --> 00:11:30.559 branding, it's a credibility play. It's also kind of a content marketing where 154 00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:33.519 they're they're learning from them. Is that specific enough? What are you looking 155 00:11:33.559 --> 00:11:37.440 for as far as it so I would go a little bit deeper on goals. 156 00:11:37.480 --> 00:11:41.600 There right, and there are three sort of categories that I would say 157 00:11:41.639 --> 00:11:46.919 that thought leadership is good at one, it can fill the sales pipeline different 158 00:11:46.919 --> 00:11:50.320 way than content marketing or other types of marketing. But you can use the 159 00:11:50.440 --> 00:11:56.240 leadership to fill the sales pipeline. Two, you can use it to continue 160 00:11:56.360 --> 00:12:01.840 conversations and deepen relationships when it would be a word or inappropriate to have a 161 00:12:01.919 --> 00:12:07.120 sales conversation. So you may have a potential buyer that's not in a by 162 00:12:07.240 --> 00:12:11.919 mode. If you go to them and you just feed them marketing, which 163 00:12:13.000 --> 00:12:16.440 is assuming that they're in the bicycle, you've got a problem. or You 164 00:12:16.440 --> 00:12:20.440 could be talking to a policy maker or a regulator or any of those folks. 165 00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:26.159 They're not buying, but what you're selling is the idea. Okay, 166 00:12:26.200 --> 00:12:28.840 so that's a second goal. The third is to influence how people think and 167 00:12:28.919 --> 00:12:33.080 act. So if you're in the C suite and you've got a vision your 168 00:12:33.159 --> 00:12:37.919 CEO, you're doing thought leadership to your organization to say this is where we're 169 00:12:37.960 --> 00:12:41.200 going, this is the future, this is how we're going to be successful. 170 00:12:41.440 --> 00:12:45.039 Right, and that's the purpose of a town hall. That's a purpose 171 00:12:45.279 --> 00:12:48.720 of all of the meetings that you do, listening sessions, etcetera. And 172 00:12:48.759 --> 00:12:56.480 then if you're trying to influence customers so that when they put out an RFP, 173 00:12:56.240 --> 00:13:01.679 they're thinking about what they want to buy from what you've already communicated to 174 00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:05.440 them and have been talking about for two years, okay? or it could 175 00:13:05.519 --> 00:13:13.759 be influencing standards and practices in the overall UM sector. Right. So, 176 00:13:13.840 --> 00:13:18.919 whether it's a specification or an industry standard, are you influencing how the world 177 00:13:18.039 --> 00:13:22.279 is going? I love those three. So I'm even just written, writing 178 00:13:22.320 --> 00:13:26.240 it down and thinking about it. So when you say create sales pipeline, 179 00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:31.159 I'm usually thinking of like you're creating demand for something that you're want to be 180 00:13:31.240 --> 00:13:35.879 known for. Your deepening relationships. I think that has a huge place in 181 00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:39.799 account based marketing, where you're, you know, building relationships with accounts and 182 00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:43.000 just can't keep it like hey, are you interested in buying yet? I 183 00:13:43.000 --> 00:13:45.960 think you even mentioned this in our our pre call yesterday, like you just 184 00:13:46.000 --> 00:13:48.519 account Reps. can't just be buying like coming up and be like Hey, 185 00:13:48.519 --> 00:13:50.000 do you have the RFP? Y? Hey, when are you putting can 186 00:13:50.120 --> 00:13:54.240 be Simpson in the back of the car going are we there yet? Are 187 00:13:54.240 --> 00:13:56.279 we there yet? You'RE gonna buy, YOU'RE gonna buy. That doesn't work 188 00:13:56.840 --> 00:14:01.360 and assuming we get back to the point where we have face to face meetings 189 00:14:01.360 --> 00:14:03.679 and business diners and that sort of thing. You can equip your salesforce, 190 00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:09.000 if you're doing it well, with thought leadership and say here are the things 191 00:14:09.039 --> 00:14:13.840 to tee up in conversation, because it will help fill your pipeline. Not 192 00:14:13.000 --> 00:14:18.399 This quarter but if you're smart, you're filling up your pipeline for next year 193 00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:22.360 on this right here, the seeds to plant. It's huge. And in 194 00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:26.000 the last one, just broader influence, kind of in some sense, trying 195 00:14:26.039 --> 00:14:33.240 to influence or steer to some degree a larger industry Um and ways people are 196 00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:37.200 thinking broadly about a topic, which is a big thing, as well as 197 00:14:37.279 --> 00:14:43.120 you can elevate a topic that isn't being talked about or discuss an existing topic 198 00:14:43.120 --> 00:14:48.080 in a new way. So essentially, thought leadership marketing can be used as 199 00:14:48.080 --> 00:14:54.440 a primary driver of category creation. Absolutely, absolutely, and maybe maybe in 200 00:14:54.440 --> 00:14:56.799 the B two B space it kind of always is. I can't think of 201 00:14:56.799 --> 00:15:01.960 a situation where you can create a maybe in a hardware space you probably could, 202 00:15:01.480 --> 00:15:05.000 but generally it's going to take thought leadership in order to power category creation 203 00:15:07.000 --> 00:15:11.639 well, and I'll give you an example on category creations. So and it's 204 00:15:11.679 --> 00:15:16.360 one where there's a different alignment between the buyer and the manufacturer. So in 205 00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:22.360 industrial equipment, Um, there's an organization that does thought leadership around. They 206 00:15:22.399 --> 00:15:28.840 build cement plants, right, which is not a very green, environmental friendly 207 00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:33.799 industry, but their corporate goal is to make the cement plants as green as 208 00:15:33.840 --> 00:15:37.399 possible. They know their buyers. That's lower on the list. And so 209 00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:41.720 where they use the leadership as they say, look, we know where public 210 00:15:41.759 --> 00:15:46.399 policy is going to go, we know how regulations are going to change and, 211 00:15:46.559 --> 00:15:50.399 as a result, instead of buying this, update your plant this way 212 00:15:50.679 --> 00:15:54.480 so that you're ahead of the game. So moving on to the fifth question. 213 00:15:54.679 --> 00:15:58.919 Are Fifth most common mistake you run into. What is that? Let's 214 00:16:00.080 --> 00:16:07.720 describe it simply as department misunderstandings and sometimes even turf wars. Right. The 215 00:16:07.759 --> 00:16:12.320 problem happens you stand up a thought leadership function. You've sort of dubbed someone 216 00:16:12.360 --> 00:16:17.039 on the shoulder and they are now the night of thought leadership, right, 217 00:16:17.919 --> 00:16:23.080 but they're in existing organization where things have been done. And what often happens 218 00:16:23.759 --> 00:16:27.759 is people say, well, weren't we doing thought leadership? We were doing 219 00:16:27.919 --> 00:16:33.000 content marketing or we were doing exact comms and we handled the speeches for sea 220 00:16:33.080 --> 00:16:41.200 levels and that sort of thing. And the problem happens when people feel threatened. 221 00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:45.720 And so you need a head of thought leadership who is willing to build 222 00:16:45.799 --> 00:16:52.519 bridges and create those relationships and trust so that they know where to call you 223 00:16:52.600 --> 00:16:56.960 in and where to call your team in and know where you're not going to 224 00:16:56.960 --> 00:17:00.960 play, that you're not trying to take over all of their sands but that 225 00:17:00.039 --> 00:17:03.680 there are things that you can do well and things they can do well. 226 00:17:03.720 --> 00:17:07.039 Certainly be worth pulling all those people into a conversation right from the beginning, 227 00:17:07.119 --> 00:17:11.519 right and hopefully, like the chant, the champion at the executive level of 228 00:17:11.559 --> 00:17:15.000 spearheading, maybe that first kickoff being like Hey, I've designated this person as 229 00:17:15.000 --> 00:17:18.400 the head of thought leadership, but you guys have to work together right and 230 00:17:18.480 --> 00:17:22.960 kicks off that meeting. And that's where the executive champions helpful in terms of 231 00:17:23.000 --> 00:17:29.480 what's really worked well is a lot of one on ones, and so I'm 232 00:17:29.480 --> 00:17:33.839 thinking of a head of thought leadership who basically went to piers across the organization 233 00:17:34.240 --> 00:17:41.559 and he said I had more lunches with piers both in town and I traveled 234 00:17:41.960 --> 00:17:47.359 just that they understood what we did right and he said I did a meet 235 00:17:47.400 --> 00:17:51.599 and greet tour for six months. So that's a lot of conversations and it 236 00:17:51.759 --> 00:17:56.200 makes sense. Um, when you look at the sixth mistake, you see 237 00:17:56.279 --> 00:17:59.599 most often where the head of thought leadership is in charge of everything. Tell 238 00:17:59.599 --> 00:18:03.640 me more out that and how it's a mistake. So there are three functions 239 00:18:03.680 --> 00:18:10.359 I would describe in thought leadership. The ability to create thought leadership, curate 240 00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:14.920 it and deploy it. The role of the head of thought leadership is to 241 00:18:15.039 --> 00:18:19.839 curate it. Marketing and different functions and marketing are great at deploying right thought 242 00:18:19.920 --> 00:18:25.839 leadership teams don't have to deploy on their own. They can lean and collaborate 243 00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:32.680 with existing marketing functions the creation. What happens is is, if you have 244 00:18:32.720 --> 00:18:36.680 an organization of any size, you've got a lot of smart ideas and brilliant 245 00:18:36.680 --> 00:18:41.000 people. You've hired smart people, and so with the head of thought leadership, 246 00:18:41.279 --> 00:18:45.759 and the reason the head of fallt leadership function is important, you're the 247 00:18:45.839 --> 00:18:51.920 person paying attention through the organization as to where are good ideas that deserve to 248 00:18:52.000 --> 00:18:56.759 be elevated or would create more value if they brought together or put in the 249 00:18:56.839 --> 00:19:00.000 hands of sales or put in the hands of marketing. Off and good ideas 250 00:19:00.079 --> 00:19:07.039 go to die in power point decks and never encounter the outside world. So 251 00:19:07.359 --> 00:19:11.240 the head of thought leadership is essentially an idea hunter. They're always looking for 252 00:19:12.119 --> 00:19:15.839 things that probably have value if it's been set inside. It's locked inside our 253 00:19:15.839 --> 00:19:18.920 power points, and they're looking for the things that probably need to be repackaged 254 00:19:18.920 --> 00:19:23.519 and sent through marketing to distribute. So they're an idea hunter and they're also 255 00:19:23.640 --> 00:19:29.519 looking for people who can speak on behalf of the organization. So if you 256 00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:32.640 think about it, there are some people who are good at writing. Put 257 00:19:32.680 --> 00:19:36.960 them on stage, they freeze. Some people are good on stage but loves 258 00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:41.359 agong writing. You're looking for talent as well as ideas and say who can 259 00:19:41.440 --> 00:19:45.319 be a good conduit to help get this idea, because there are times where 260 00:19:45.759 --> 00:19:52.799 someone leaves the organization, they get taken for a new position or go to 261 00:19:52.839 --> 00:19:56.240 a competitor or they retire or they go on sickly for something, and you 262 00:19:56.319 --> 00:20:03.000 can't depend on that one person in the organization. And that's why, instead 263 00:20:03.000 --> 00:20:06.880 of trying to do it all, you're trying to build a team and make 264 00:20:06.920 --> 00:20:12.440 thought leadership everyone's responsibility. Some people create, some curate, some deploy to 265 00:20:12.519 --> 00:20:18.039 kind of go on a slight rabbit trail between writing and speaking. Which one 266 00:20:18.079 --> 00:20:22.400 is more powerful as a thought leadership content? It depends on the person who's 267 00:20:22.440 --> 00:20:27.440 doing it right. There are people who can stand in front of a room 268 00:20:27.480 --> 00:20:33.799 of ten people and bring them to tears, right, or they can paint 269 00:20:33.799 --> 00:20:36.480 a vision of the future that says, yes, we need to do something. 270 00:20:37.039 --> 00:20:41.319 There are other people who can write an article or write a piece that 271 00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:48.559 just goes viral. Right. You have to find people who are skilled in 272 00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:52.240 the medium and you may find someone who is a genius at the ideas but 273 00:20:52.279 --> 00:20:56.440 they're not a communicator. Pair them with a communicator, someone who's a writer, 274 00:20:56.839 --> 00:21:02.039 or get them a speech writer find a way to help the idea fly. 275 00:21:03.400 --> 00:21:07.480 So essentially there's subject matter experts. Like this happens with Um. I 276 00:21:07.559 --> 00:21:10.319 was amazed when I found this out about the Harvard Business Review, is hardly 277 00:21:10.359 --> 00:21:14.000 ever written by the people whose bylines are on it. Right. They're usually 278 00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:18.680 writers who interviewed the subject matter expert and actually turn their their ideas into things 279 00:21:18.759 --> 00:21:22.160 that people like to read. Um. So you're talking like doing things like 280 00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:26.960 that exactly. So if you're an expert in logistics, you haven't spent your 281 00:21:26.000 --> 00:21:32.079 career writing business school articles for HBR. That's not your lane, but you 282 00:21:32.160 --> 00:21:36.440 have the insight param with someone who can communicate that idea in a way that 283 00:21:36.440 --> 00:21:40.599 people go wow, we should be doing that. Moving on to the seventh 284 00:21:40.599 --> 00:21:45.759 one. What is the seventh most common mistake? You see, so the 285 00:21:45.759 --> 00:21:52.559 head of the leadership needs allies within the organization, and this is the metaphor 286 00:21:52.599 --> 00:21:56.880 that I said, top to bottom and across. Allies open doors for you 287 00:21:57.680 --> 00:22:03.200 and bassadors speak on your behalf. Your sales force can be allies for you 288 00:22:03.519 --> 00:22:07.759 where they go, Oh, let's get you in this room to talk, 289 00:22:07.480 --> 00:22:12.119 or they can be ambassadors. You equip them with the right information, they're 290 00:22:12.160 --> 00:22:18.839 going to talk to all of your prospects. Your marketing team are also potentially 291 00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:25.119 allies and ambassadors, people in product or research or in customer service. You 292 00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:30.720 have to be listening because the insights don't always come from within the walls of 293 00:22:30.759 --> 00:22:36.759 the organization. So you want to build a listening network that brings information to 294 00:22:36.920 --> 00:22:40.559 you as the head of thought leadership, so that you can figure out is 295 00:22:40.599 --> 00:22:45.799 this signal or is this noise and if it's signal, what do we do 296 00:22:45.920 --> 00:22:49.039 with it? Who needs to hear it and what action do we need to 297 00:22:49.079 --> 00:22:56.400 take today? What are some like common things, common ways? People usually 298 00:22:56.440 --> 00:23:00.240 get that wrong and then get unstuck with that if they're if they're bad at 299 00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:07.880 finding allies. So if they're not good at finding allies, they're not thinking 300 00:23:07.920 --> 00:23:12.440 about the relationship side of the role. Okay, and I think back to 301 00:23:12.759 --> 00:23:18.240 Marshall Goldsmith, wrote a great book in terms of the early part of his 302 00:23:18.319 --> 00:23:22.519 career. What got you here won't get you there. The head of thought 303 00:23:22.599 --> 00:23:29.000 leadership has to focus on the relationships and if you're not doing that and if 304 00:23:29.000 --> 00:23:33.960 you're focused solely on thinking, the best idea will automatically win in the marketplace 305 00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:37.799 of ideas, and your job is just to find the best ideas, you're 306 00:23:37.799 --> 00:23:45.319 going to hit the wall again and again because, as you know and as 307 00:23:45.319 --> 00:23:51.599 our listeners know, marketing creates unfair advantages. Right, you need a good 308 00:23:51.640 --> 00:23:57.440 idea with excellent marketing. That's gonna fly. An excellent idea with weak marketing 309 00:23:57.559 --> 00:24:02.359 doesn't go anywhere, and a big part of that is the people around you. 310 00:24:02.640 --> 00:24:06.519 Right exactly, you're working in an organization it takes more than one person 311 00:24:06.559 --> 00:24:08.359 to get the idea out there, unless your team is so small and you're 312 00:24:08.359 --> 00:24:12.240 the only one in charge of thought leadership and marketing right exactly. Even then 313 00:24:14.160 --> 00:24:17.599 you could get into trouble if you're just publishing all the time and not checking 314 00:24:17.640 --> 00:24:21.400 in with your few teammates. Right. A lot of this is about relationship. 315 00:24:22.160 --> 00:24:25.640 What is the eighth most common mistake you see people make? So the 316 00:24:25.720 --> 00:24:30.200 eighth, I would say, is that people get impatient. The organization, 317 00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:33.319 the head of thought leadership, others around and they go, Oh, we 318 00:24:33.400 --> 00:24:38.759 set this function up three months ago. What have they done? What have 319 00:24:38.839 --> 00:24:45.039 they accomplished? And they may have some early wins, but the team needs 320 00:24:45.200 --> 00:24:49.240 time to get their feet underneath them and also be able to achieve the goals 321 00:24:49.519 --> 00:24:56.119 right. And so if you're talking about creating assets and getting them out there, 322 00:24:56.160 --> 00:25:02.000 I encourage rapid prototyping. Always test, to get into market tested as 323 00:25:02.039 --> 00:25:06.519 fast as you can. But the big winds and results where people go oh 324 00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:10.519 now, I see this works. If you're thinking on a ninety day horizon, 325 00:25:10.920 --> 00:25:15.319 you're being too impatient. You've got to think at least a year to 326 00:25:15.759 --> 00:25:22.119 let the team find its way and to build those relationships and create those wins. 327 00:25:22.839 --> 00:25:26.079 And is that a year from like first publication of your first piece, 328 00:25:26.160 --> 00:25:30.720 or a year from when you actually start start thinking about it planning? Well, 329 00:25:30.839 --> 00:25:36.160 I would say it's a year from when you actually launched the team. 330 00:25:36.200 --> 00:25:41.319 Okay, don't expect that they're going to be knocking home runs out of the 331 00:25:41.359 --> 00:25:45.160 park on day one. It may happen and that's a delight, but you 332 00:25:45.200 --> 00:25:48.839 have to think about standing this as a function for the long haul and if 333 00:25:48.839 --> 00:25:53.160 you're thinking about this on a ninety day trial, it's not going to work. 334 00:25:53.839 --> 00:25:59.079 Most organizations that I've seen be successful with this have looked and said this 335 00:25:59.160 --> 00:26:03.519 is a multi year commitment and year number one we're going to go out, 336 00:26:03.680 --> 00:26:07.240 we're going to try stuff. Some things will succeed, some will fail. 337 00:26:07.400 --> 00:26:11.319 Look at that. Will set more specific goals in year two and by year 338 00:26:11.359 --> 00:26:14.759 three we know what we're doing, we do have our lanes and we've got 339 00:26:14.759 --> 00:26:18.359 our processes. Would you say you should probably commit to like a three to 340 00:26:18.440 --> 00:26:22.640 five year commitment towards making this a thing? It's kind of like it's you 341 00:26:22.680 --> 00:26:25.680 really have to think broad and big picture, which means it's like it's going 342 00:26:25.720 --> 00:26:29.319 to take a few years for this to become the full weight of what we 343 00:26:29.359 --> 00:26:32.839 want to see, but we might start to see some inklings of success about 344 00:26:32.839 --> 00:26:36.200 a year in. Right. It's a big picture, which is why, 345 00:26:36.400 --> 00:26:38.000 going back to the earlier point, in the first point that I said of 346 00:26:38.079 --> 00:26:44.079 no executive champion, you have to have someone on senior leadership who's patient enough 347 00:26:44.119 --> 00:26:48.480 and go no, we're planting seeds. This will pay off in big ways, 348 00:26:48.519 --> 00:26:55.759 but we don't expect them to be successful next month because chances are thought 349 00:26:55.839 --> 00:26:59.200 leadership, you know, it can create demand, it can create some more 350 00:26:59.240 --> 00:27:03.559 short term results, but really it's more of a branding play. Really it's 351 00:27:03.599 --> 00:27:07.599 more of a positioning play to some degree, where it's it's you're trying to 352 00:27:07.640 --> 00:27:12.400 position yourself as a leader in some respect in your your customer's mind right, 353 00:27:12.400 --> 00:27:15.720 which takes I don't know, it kind of takes a while for you to 354 00:27:15.720 --> 00:27:22.039 build that kind of reputation amongst your buyers. Reputation and trust absolutely matter. 355 00:27:22.640 --> 00:27:27.680 Also, it takes repetition, because your listener rarely will hear something once and 356 00:27:27.720 --> 00:27:33.000 go oh, yes, I agree, I'm all in right. You have 357 00:27:33.079 --> 00:27:37.640 to repeat an idea several times. So there's a time period there the way 358 00:27:37.680 --> 00:27:41.400 that I define felt leadership is you're looking around the corner into the future and 359 00:27:41.519 --> 00:27:48.000 you're looking to see what are the risks and opportunities and make sense of them. 360 00:27:48.519 --> 00:27:52.039 Then you bring that information back to people today and say here's what we 361 00:27:52.079 --> 00:27:59.079 see it's coming and here's what you should be doing to prepare right, and 362 00:27:59.640 --> 00:28:03.359 you build trust by telling them about the future, telling them what to do. 363 00:28:03.000 --> 00:28:07.000 They take the action, they go wow, that paid off six or 364 00:28:07.079 --> 00:28:11.039 nine months later, right. So there's a trust building cycle. If you're 365 00:28:11.079 --> 00:28:17.160 in a transactional sort of relationship with your customer, you don't have as much 366 00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:19.799 of the time to build trust, but a lot of B two B is 367 00:28:19.839 --> 00:28:23.799 relationship driven in an a B M driven right. So just I was just 368 00:28:23.839 --> 00:28:27.720 talking to grant Butler yesterday and one of the interesting things that stood out to 369 00:28:27.720 --> 00:28:33.480 me that he said was that if journalism is past focused thought, leadership is 370 00:28:33.480 --> 00:28:38.119 really future focused. You're not necessarily writing the future, but I guessly in 371 00:28:38.160 --> 00:28:41.920 it sense you are. You're trying to write the future. You're trying to 372 00:28:41.960 --> 00:28:45.000 say, hey, we should be going this way for whatever reason. It 373 00:28:45.079 --> 00:28:48.720 might just be more effective, it might be better for everybody involved if we 374 00:28:48.759 --> 00:28:53.039 go this way, you should go this way. What's the ninth most common 375 00:28:53.160 --> 00:28:57.279 mistake? You See? You have to make it something that's inclusive. If 376 00:28:57.559 --> 00:29:03.440 you present thoughtly ship that's done by only a handful of elite people in the 377 00:29:03.480 --> 00:29:11.319 company or that it's something that is full reserved for a very few, it 378 00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:18.039 doesn't work. Where I've seen it be most successful is when that senior leader 379 00:29:18.160 --> 00:29:22.119 says, Hey, we're going on a journey and we all have to invest 380 00:29:22.559 --> 00:29:26.640 in thought leadership. That doesn't mean all of us are writing or speaking, 381 00:29:26.960 --> 00:29:30.160 that doesn't mean all of us are posting, but we have to be willing 382 00:29:30.240 --> 00:29:37.720 to talk about these ideas, engage our customers and speak with one voice in 383 00:29:37.799 --> 00:29:44.839 thought leadership. And where I've seen it take most success is when the organization 384 00:29:45.400 --> 00:29:49.200 says, yeah, this is partly everybody's responsibility, rather than Oh, you 385 00:29:49.279 --> 00:29:53.319 do thought leadership, that means you're smarter than everybody else. Right, that's 386 00:29:53.359 --> 00:29:59.160 not the case. Funny. Would you say it's company wide? Yeah, 387 00:29:59.279 --> 00:30:03.880 I would a at least say that, and I would say that a vast 388 00:30:03.920 --> 00:30:14.000 array of the ideas within an organization are in the corners that people often overlook. 389 00:30:14.839 --> 00:30:21.559 So I can think of a consumer package goods company where they identify thought 390 00:30:21.640 --> 00:30:26.519 leadership globally and they have hundreds of thousands of employees. Right one of their 391 00:30:26.599 --> 00:30:33.119 expertise is yeast and understanding yeast and you might guess, is to sort of 392 00:30:33.160 --> 00:30:42.599 what industry they're in. But those people in terms of brewing are absolutely critical 393 00:30:44.279 --> 00:30:48.599 for them and if you lose someone with that knowledge, not just as a 394 00:30:48.640 --> 00:30:52.799 subject matter expert, but they retire and that knowledge isn't transferred to the next 395 00:30:52.839 --> 00:30:59.279 generation, that knowledge has walked out the door. I've certainly I think there's 396 00:30:59.279 --> 00:31:02.480 different opinion is on this. Particularly some people are like no, some people 397 00:31:02.519 --> 00:31:04.319 are very set on it being like the founder, CEO, you know, 398 00:31:04.319 --> 00:31:08.640 and staying in the C suite. I've seen groups, usually everybody's on the 399 00:31:08.680 --> 00:31:11.680 same page that you probably just shouldn't have one subject matter expert that's the thought 400 00:31:11.759 --> 00:31:18.000 leader because of that person, you know leaves or it tragically disappears or something 401 00:31:18.079 --> 00:31:21.119 like that, then you've you've put a little bit too much investment in just 402 00:31:21.160 --> 00:31:23.880 one face and one person. But I've not heard a lot of people talk 403 00:31:23.920 --> 00:31:27.319 about unlocking the whole organization. I have heard of other people talking about it 404 00:31:27.359 --> 00:31:30.480 and that's kind of where I'm leaning personally is like not like everybody's got a 405 00:31:30.480 --> 00:31:34.839 little something to offer. Some, of course, some have way more to 406 00:31:34.920 --> 00:31:38.960 offer than others, but it almost seems like everybody has a little piece of 407 00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:42.160 expertise, especially since they're kind of doing it full time right and working in 408 00:31:42.160 --> 00:31:45.720 your organization and working in that particular position that you're at in your industry. 409 00:31:47.079 --> 00:31:51.039 There's gonna be a lot they're especially collectively. If you can find it, 410 00:31:52.440 --> 00:31:55.279 though, setting up the systems and processes to get it out there must be. 411 00:31:55.519 --> 00:31:59.920 Must be an interesting work right there. And if you can idea, 412 00:32:00.039 --> 00:32:06.839 defy and communicate within an organization. Here's the value I ad here's my unique 413 00:32:06.839 --> 00:32:10.160 perspective. This is what I do. That really helps the custody shine. 414 00:32:10.480 --> 00:32:15.400 That's great for morale. That also creates more and more differentiators when you're trying 415 00:32:15.400 --> 00:32:22.400 to go to market, and it creates an environment where people want to contribute 416 00:32:22.759 --> 00:32:27.640 their best thinking and effort rather than they see themselves as a cog in a 417 00:32:27.799 --> 00:32:30.000 large machine. I like that. That's kind of where we're heading with sweet 418 00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:32.640 fish media. It's just good to hear somebody else say it so I'm not 419 00:32:32.680 --> 00:32:36.519 like alone in my thinking. I'm like I feel like everybody could be it, 420 00:32:36.640 --> 00:32:40.160 but I don't know, it seems like that's not as as popular as 421 00:32:40.160 --> 00:32:45.079 an opinion, where most people are trying to trying to most people are trying 422 00:32:45.119 --> 00:32:49.039 to select a few subject matter experts, you know, three or four, 423 00:32:49.640 --> 00:32:52.880 and then it depends on what size they are. But that's the more common 424 00:32:52.039 --> 00:32:57.440 route unless, uh, I don't know. I guess organizations like Mackenzie and 425 00:32:57.480 --> 00:33:01.960 Deloitte will often have multiple people submit to a journal of some kind. Well, 426 00:33:02.000 --> 00:33:07.799 in professional services is an area that has done this longer than many, 427 00:33:07.839 --> 00:33:15.720 because if you're one of the big consultancies or if you're um working in programming 428 00:33:15.079 --> 00:33:21.960 and software and doing solutions and that for your clients, you're selling the knowledge 429 00:33:21.960 --> 00:33:27.559 of your people and the more that you can showcase your workforce as able to 430 00:33:27.599 --> 00:33:32.519 solve smart problems, then you win more deals. Right. That's a big 431 00:33:32.519 --> 00:33:37.119 win Um and I'm looking forward to roll inside and sweet fish to see if 432 00:33:37.119 --> 00:33:40.799 we can kind of replicate their success that they've had. So the last one, 433 00:33:40.799 --> 00:33:43.960 I want to make sure we hit all tens. I promised all ten. 434 00:33:45.480 --> 00:33:47.680 The last one. What was the last mistake that most companies make when 435 00:33:47.680 --> 00:33:52.440 trying to implement thought leadership programs. So the last one I'll say simply the 436 00:33:52.519 --> 00:33:59.359 organization tries to measure success by the wrong standards, and so this is like 437 00:33:59.559 --> 00:34:06.039 pulling a metric wrench when you need a standard wrench right and you're trying to 438 00:34:06.039 --> 00:34:08.960 turn it, but it doesn't work. And so the most common version of 439 00:34:09.000 --> 00:34:17.679 this mistake is when you start applying content marketing metrics to thought leadership and you 440 00:34:17.760 --> 00:34:23.840 wind up rewarding and in scenting the wrong results. So what are those metrics 441 00:34:23.880 --> 00:34:29.159 that are commonly applied and what are better metrics? So I'll start with what 442 00:34:29.400 --> 00:34:34.360 commonly gets applied and often sometimes I just have to say Whoa, Whoa stop. 443 00:34:35.280 --> 00:34:40.880 So views impressions, attendees at Events and conferences, and I had a 444 00:34:40.920 --> 00:34:45.519 conversation once with a client who said, okay, we did this Webinar and 445 00:34:45.719 --> 00:34:50.280 we had x thousand number of attendees. I said, great, which of 446 00:34:50.320 --> 00:34:54.519 those attendees were the most important people that you needed to reach to make this 447 00:34:54.599 --> 00:35:00.400 idea fly? And do you know who those people were? Were they watching? 448 00:35:00.400 --> 00:35:04.840 Where they engaged? And there was a moment of silence. Instead of 449 00:35:04.920 --> 00:35:12.760 looking at the aggregate attendees and saying a bigger number is better. It's if 450 00:35:12.800 --> 00:35:17.719 you're creating impact, some of your target audiences are able to open doors more 451 00:35:17.760 --> 00:35:23.039 effectively for you be decision makers that can create impact or achieve results, and 452 00:35:23.079 --> 00:35:29.960 if you get to them and they buy in, then the idea goes further 453 00:35:30.039 --> 00:35:32.960 and faster at scale. So you talked about events, but what are other 454 00:35:34.000 --> 00:35:37.400 metrics you can look at if you're not doing events at all? Is it 455 00:35:37.480 --> 00:35:40.239 kind of the same thing applied to podcasting, for example? Exactly? So 456 00:35:40.760 --> 00:35:45.760 you don't know exactly who's listening unless you pay a ton. Recently I did 457 00:35:45.760 --> 00:35:47.800 find software that will tell you what companies are listening to your podcast, but 458 00:35:47.880 --> 00:35:52.199 it costs like five hundred bucks a month and I was like, well, 459 00:35:52.239 --> 00:35:55.480 and that's the difficulty, right. In podcasting, you look and you say, 460 00:35:55.519 --> 00:36:00.719 okay, I've put bait out there for people to listen and two, 461 00:36:00.440 --> 00:36:04.519 not only one, are people listening, but then two, are they the 462 00:36:04.679 --> 00:36:08.000 right people? And if you focus on the number of how many downloads did 463 00:36:08.039 --> 00:36:14.480 you have in a month? Right, it's a very squishy status statistic. 464 00:36:14.559 --> 00:36:17.519 It's like Um putting out a press release and going Oh, we had this 465 00:36:17.599 --> 00:36:22.880 much reach, congratulations, but did you reach the right people, okay, 466 00:36:23.119 --> 00:36:29.519 and so that's why you launched the conversation here and said we do a very 467 00:36:29.639 --> 00:36:35.920 niche podcast on thought leadership. Right. We consciously made that choice to go 468 00:36:36.119 --> 00:36:39.239 niche rather than broad, and we said these are the people we want to 469 00:36:39.320 --> 00:36:46.559 reach and we're irrelevant to ninety nine of the world's population, where they shouldn't 470 00:36:46.559 --> 00:36:51.119 listen to us. They should go do something else and more valuable with their 471 00:36:51.159 --> 00:36:58.719 time in life. But you want to be indispensably relevant to that fraction of 472 00:36:58.760 --> 00:37:01.920 a percent of the world. Okay, I'll give you a few pieces, 473 00:37:01.920 --> 00:37:07.960 and these go into ANNEC data rather than hard data, but they're good, 474 00:37:07.320 --> 00:37:13.039 good example. So when we put out a podcast and we have people to 475 00:37:13.159 --> 00:37:16.280 come back to us and say I listened to your podcast and it sounded like 476 00:37:16.440 --> 00:37:22.559 you were in the room talking to me and I was sitting with your guests 477 00:37:22.760 --> 00:37:24.840 and we were around a table talking about issues I cared about, that you've 478 00:37:24.880 --> 00:37:30.719 walked into my office, that's when you know you want because that person that 479 00:37:30.760 --> 00:37:35.199 you were trying to reach is most likely a buyer and they were paying really 480 00:37:35.239 --> 00:37:39.000 close attention. That's beautiful and while we had to take usually a slightly different 481 00:37:39.000 --> 00:37:43.400 approach with our podcasting. I could certainly see the benefit of creating a very 482 00:37:43.519 --> 00:37:46.199 niche podcast and at the end of the day it's even something. And I'm 483 00:37:46.239 --> 00:37:50.199 still measuring, though. I usually counted a little bit more on Linkedin, 484 00:37:50.239 --> 00:37:52.679 where you can see exactly who's interacting with your comment, who you're engaging within 485 00:37:52.719 --> 00:37:57.320 comments. It's on Linkedin, it's like, I don't know why, if 486 00:37:57.320 --> 00:37:59.480 you're in B two B and you're not active on Linkedin, I'm like, 487 00:37:59.480 --> 00:38:01.960 why is? It gives you so much freight information, like every everybody's on 488 00:38:02.000 --> 00:38:07.119 there. Well, and Lincoln is because you can see who's engaging with your 489 00:38:07.159 --> 00:38:10.360 idea and do they fit the types of people that you want to reach? 490 00:38:10.440 --> 00:38:15.440 You can actually see if you're reaching the people because they're the ones in the 491 00:38:15.440 --> 00:38:19.119 comments right or you can just more easily go and find the people who are 492 00:38:19.119 --> 00:38:21.679 active in your space, who you'd like to do business with, and engage 493 00:38:21.719 --> 00:38:23.679 with them in their comments, start talking commenting with them and then all of 494 00:38:23.719 --> 00:38:27.880 a sudden they start showing up in yours. It's a beautiful thing. So 495 00:38:28.599 --> 00:38:34.000 I love that. Essentially, uh you're measuring percentage reached on the key accounts 496 00:38:34.039 --> 00:38:37.599 that you want to do business with. Exactly, and you also measure impact 497 00:38:37.639 --> 00:38:45.840 in different ways. So another example is if you're responsible for thought leadership for 498 00:38:45.920 --> 00:38:52.719 your executive team and they're meeting people in industry and you're giving them a list 499 00:38:52.760 --> 00:38:55.360 of pull sides, for example, of here, the pull sides and the 500 00:38:55.960 --> 00:39:00.039 free minute conversations that you're going to have while you're at this event, and 501 00:39:00.360 --> 00:39:07.280 those conversations may not bear fruit in six months. Those are strategic deals, 502 00:39:07.320 --> 00:39:13.559 those are relationships that have to be nurtured, and so the initial thing is 503 00:39:13.760 --> 00:39:17.360 checklist. Did all those conversations happen? Yes or no? Great, did 504 00:39:17.400 --> 00:39:22.199 we get a follow up on those conversations afterwards, within a couple of weeks? 505 00:39:22.800 --> 00:39:27.679 You almost have to think on a campaign level and say, if this 506 00:39:27.760 --> 00:39:31.880 is moving forward, what evidence would I be seen? Um, I know 507 00:39:31.960 --> 00:39:37.119 the evidence I'd be looking for is one consumption. Consumption would be number one. 508 00:39:37.480 --> 00:39:43.280 After that I'd be looking for how many people are like responding to it. 509 00:39:43.639 --> 00:39:46.119 So usually, depending on the medium, there's different ways where people can 510 00:39:46.159 --> 00:39:51.159 respond and linked in it's comments, but oftentimes people can just mention it. 511 00:39:51.239 --> 00:39:53.440 I usually just ask customers or new new prospects in the pipeline. Oh, 512 00:39:53.440 --> 00:39:57.119 where'd you hear about us. Oh, we saw this and then I read 513 00:39:57.159 --> 00:39:59.519 this. You know, they start to tell you themselves where they come and 514 00:39:59.559 --> 00:40:01.320 I usually listen for like Oh, like, what did they read before? 515 00:40:01.519 --> 00:40:05.559 Were they listening to the podcast where they literally just come off a Linkedin? 516 00:40:05.599 --> 00:40:07.480 They didn't even listen to our PODCAST, but we've been talking about it so 517 00:40:07.559 --> 00:40:10.320 much on Linkedin. You know, Um, what kinds of things did they 518 00:40:10.360 --> 00:40:15.079 read and what kind of maybe even based on the kind of questions or point 519 00:40:15.079 --> 00:40:17.320 of view they're coming with it, I can tell like what they've read recently, 520 00:40:17.800 --> 00:40:22.400 all things that kind of measure the thought leadership or the strength of the 521 00:40:22.400 --> 00:40:27.159 thought leadership content. Another good example is with the podcast. If you have 522 00:40:27.320 --> 00:40:30.239 people who come to you and say, I've been listening to you for a 523 00:40:30.320 --> 00:40:34.920 year or whatever and it wasn't the right time for me to come to you, 524 00:40:35.239 --> 00:40:37.880 but now is all of a sudden you've closed your sales cycle from a 525 00:40:38.000 --> 00:40:42.400 year long where you were chasing someone where it wasn't the right by time. 526 00:40:42.440 --> 00:40:45.800 Too, they show up and they're ready to close the deal almost immediately. 527 00:40:46.199 --> 00:40:50.800 Man, this has been fantastic and going through tens usually a lot for a 528 00:40:50.840 --> 00:40:53.599 list in a podcast, but it's been fun to kind of hear all these 529 00:40:53.599 --> 00:40:57.280 different perspectives. I know I've gotten a lot of nuggets out of it just 530 00:40:57.440 --> 00:41:00.960 even thinking through like Oh, like sweet fish is all company compared to people. 531 00:41:01.039 --> 00:41:04.920 I mean we have thirty employees and companies of, you know, hundreds, 532 00:41:04.960 --> 00:41:07.119 thousands some of the dynamics. So you might have to face if you're 533 00:41:07.119 --> 00:41:10.840 a thought leader in those companies. And I'm sure the audience has gotten quite 534 00:41:10.840 --> 00:41:15.360 a few nuggets out of it. I know I have Um for my future. 535 00:41:15.400 --> 00:41:19.599 We're trying to implement thought leadership for sweet fish. I know you want 536 00:41:19.639 --> 00:41:23.159 to talk a little bit about the stevie awards for women in Business, Bill, 537 00:41:23.239 --> 00:41:27.559 so tell us a little bit about that and why what the audience can 538 00:41:27.599 --> 00:41:30.199 do to go check that out. Yes, so one of the things that 539 00:41:30.599 --> 00:41:37.800 we recognized is thought leadership, as an evolving function, needs to recognize excellence 540 00:41:38.159 --> 00:41:46.840 and so we partnered with the stevie business awards specifically for recognizing excellence and thought 541 00:41:46.920 --> 00:41:55.360 leadership and they do a series of eight different award programs, international Um US 542 00:41:55.480 --> 00:42:00.239 business awards over the course of the year. The category story that's just opened 543 00:42:00.360 --> 00:42:07.119 up as of the middle of May is for women in business and recognizing thought 544 00:42:07.239 --> 00:42:14.119 leadership excellence in three categories for women in business. One, organizations that are 545 00:42:14.239 --> 00:42:20.079 doing an excellent job of developing women as thought leadership practitioners and promoting their ideas 546 00:42:20.159 --> 00:42:24.360 within and beyond the organization too, excellence and thought leadership campaigns by and for 547 00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:32.320 women, and then three, excellence as best female thought leader for themselves and 548 00:42:32.400 --> 00:42:37.400 for their organization. There will be other categories going on, but we felt 549 00:42:37.440 --> 00:42:45.039 it was absolutely critical and essential to start really within the business space, recognizing 550 00:42:45.039 --> 00:42:51.440 the folks who are day to day doing thought leadership and the excellent work they're 551 00:42:51.480 --> 00:42:57.440 doing for their companies. That's great. So where there are places where you 552 00:42:57.440 --> 00:43:04.239 can nominate women Um or making did? You go to Stevie awards and you 553 00:43:04.280 --> 00:43:08.679 can download a nomination packet. So if you think you fit one of these 554 00:43:08.679 --> 00:43:15.000 categories for women in business, go to the Stevie awards downloaded and submit. 555 00:43:15.679 --> 00:43:19.719 Or if you know someone who fits this category, and I encourage you because 556 00:43:20.039 --> 00:43:23.760 especially with women in thought leadership, women have sometimes told themselves know, what 557 00:43:23.800 --> 00:43:29.480 I'm doing really isn't thought leadership for their my business, or they've had their 558 00:43:29.480 --> 00:43:32.159 colleagues say that's not thought leadership. You don't have to speak that sort of 559 00:43:32.159 --> 00:43:37.119 thing. They've actually actively been dismissed. If you know someone who fits this 560 00:43:37.199 --> 00:43:39.719 category, reach out to them say hey, I know you're rocking it here 561 00:43:39.719 --> 00:43:44.760 in thought leadership. You're doing amazing work. Take a look at this. 562 00:43:45.360 --> 00:43:51.480 It's worth you seeing if you want to apply, and we want to celebrate 563 00:43:51.920 --> 00:43:55.519 the best work of thought leadership that's out there. It's fantastic. I definitely 564 00:43:55.559 --> 00:43:59.239 have someone in mind, somebody that interviewed for this podcast and I was like, 565 00:43:59.280 --> 00:44:00.440 how do you not have a book on this topic already, like I 566 00:44:00.440 --> 00:44:04.559 would have learned so much. So I'm like I can already think of somebody 567 00:44:04.599 --> 00:44:07.480 that I could I want to right up and put in a nomination for them 568 00:44:07.480 --> 00:44:09.719 and then let them know like Hey, look, I've nominated you for this 569 00:44:09.800 --> 00:44:15.599 because you freaking earned it and somebody, somebody needed to like toot your horn 570 00:44:15.679 --> 00:44:19.000 for you, you know. So I'm sure there's a number of people in 571 00:44:19.039 --> 00:44:22.280 the listening right now where you know somebody who deserves it, who's been working 572 00:44:22.360 --> 00:44:27.840 undercover or as a brilliant thought leader and maybe doesn't get recognized enough or gets 573 00:44:27.840 --> 00:44:32.320 recognized a lot and still could use some more because they continue to do great 574 00:44:32.360 --> 00:44:36.360 things. They don't just rest on their laurels from long ago. They're continuing 575 00:44:36.400 --> 00:44:39.119 to push the envelope. So I recommend all the audience to go and check 576 00:44:39.239 --> 00:44:45.639 that out. Um Bill, this has been a wonderful episode, learning from 577 00:44:45.679 --> 00:44:50.119 you, taking advantage of your years of Wisdom that you've Buelt coaching so many 578 00:44:50.280 --> 00:44:53.320 thought leader practitioners through the craft of thought leadership. Um. But people want 579 00:44:53.360 --> 00:44:57.000 to learn more from you work. Can they go to find you online? 580 00:44:58.000 --> 00:45:02.760 So the best place to find me is thought leadership leverages, our company. 581 00:45:02.840 --> 00:45:07.079 That's thought leadership leverage dot com, or look for me on Linkedin. I 582 00:45:07.280 --> 00:45:13.679 use the personal Hashtag or T L O R G T L, and I'm 583 00:45:13.679 --> 00:45:28.639 Bill Sherman. B Two B growth is brought to you by the team at 584 00:45:28.639 --> 00:45:30.800 sweet fish media. Here at Sweet Fish, we produced podcasts for some of 585 00:45:30.840 --> 00:45:35.920 the most innovative brands in the world and we help them turn those podcasts into 586 00:45:35.920 --> 00:45:39.039 micro videos, linkedin content, blog posts and more. We're on a mission 587 00:45:39.079 --> 00:45:44.599 to produce every leader's favorite show. Want more information, visit sweet fish media 588 00:45:44.760 --> 00:45:52.119 DOT com.