Feb. 6, 2021

Scaling One-to-Few and One-to-One Campaigns

In this episode, Dan Sanchez talks with Maria Edlefsen, Global ABM Program Manager at Ivalua, about how she finds and narrows down the highest potential accounts for ABM campaigns. 

Maria also explains: 

  • Where she goes to get a list of accounts and what attributes she uses to trim it down.
  • How to automate and scale an ABM campaign.
  • How sales and marketing can work together on an ABM campaign.
  • The difference between one-to-many campaigns and one-to-one campaigns.
Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:05.140 --> 00:00:08.580 Welcome back to baby Growth. I'm Dan Sanchez with sweet Fish Media. And 2 00:00:08.580 --> 00:00:14.700 today I'm joined by Maria Ed Lifson. Who is the global a bm program manager 3 00:00:14.710 --> 00:00:19.320 at I Value. Uh, Maria, I thought I'd kick it off with a fun question. And 4 00:00:19.320 --> 00:00:22.690 that's what was the highlight of your day So far. I know we have, Ah, 5 00:00:22.700 --> 00:00:25.600 substantial time difference and you're at the end of your day and I'm at the 6 00:00:25.600 --> 00:00:29.020 beginning of my day. So what's the best thing that's happened to you today? It 7 00:00:29.020 --> 00:00:33.040 was probably doing a workout with my daughter. It was it was really fun. We 8 00:00:33.040 --> 00:00:38.450 took a break and we waited a mom daughter workout. So that was a new 9 00:00:38.450 --> 00:00:41.730 thing. We tried together, and it it made us laugh. That's awesome. I 10 00:00:41.740 --> 00:00:44.150 haven't done that with my kids since they were little on. They were so 11 00:00:44.150 --> 00:00:47.850 little that they were the bar bell, you know, now they're too big for that. But 12 00:00:48.240 --> 00:00:53.030 that sounds amazing. As you guys knows, you're listening to this episode, we 13 00:00:53.040 --> 00:00:58.990 are still on our deep dive into account based marketing on I brought Maria onto 14 00:00:58.990 --> 00:01:03.160 the show as a case study is someone who's implementing an A B M campaign, 15 00:01:03.160 --> 00:01:07.370 So I as a still kind of a B two b newbie, I'm still learning all these 16 00:01:07.370 --> 00:01:10.630 different B two B strategies. The first one we're diving into is account based 17 00:01:10.630 --> 00:01:14.290 marketing, and I'm so excited to kind of learn that nuances of this I know 18 00:01:14.290 --> 00:01:17.670 Maria has got some new things we've even talked about in the pre interview. 19 00:01:17.670 --> 00:01:23.040 So I'm excited to jump in to this topic with her today and see how she's 20 00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:28.060 killing it with this b two b marketing strategy. So, Maria, I know you 21 00:01:28.060 --> 00:01:32.660 implemented some a B m at your last company, but tell me like starting with 22 00:01:32.670 --> 00:01:36.710 high value, uh, a Z you enter the company and started seeing the need for 23 00:01:36.710 --> 00:01:39.860 what were some of the signs that, you know you need to get started with this 24 00:01:39.860 --> 00:01:44.780 particular B two B strategy? Well, first of all, I shifted from running 25 00:01:44.780 --> 00:01:49.880 one markets running five markets, so that means that I had target accounts 26 00:01:49.880 --> 00:01:54.450 across five different countries. And of course I'm only one person managing all 27 00:01:54.450 --> 00:01:58.970 of these target accounts, So I needed to find a way where I could find the 28 00:01:58.970 --> 00:02:04.260 high potential accounts and that way, I wouldn't, you know, waste my budget a 29 00:02:04.260 --> 00:02:08.560 waste. My resource is so that was the the beginning of it. So it's 30 00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:11.790 interesting. It's kind of like you had the individual need. You're just like, 31 00:02:11.790 --> 00:02:16.350 Hey, there's only so much ground I can cover myself. Yeah, I just need to 32 00:02:16.350 --> 00:02:21.230 figure out a way to reach the best people faster. Exactly. And I'm also in 33 00:02:21.230 --> 00:02:26.750 the B two b business where we sell software, so we have a narrow target 34 00:02:26.750 --> 00:02:32.120 group, as it is, and we also try to find the best value at as a fit for us. 35 00:02:32.130 --> 00:02:36.070 So that narrows the target group down even further. And it means that there 36 00:02:36.070 --> 00:02:40.970 are a lot of accounts that we simply shouldn't focus our time on. So we have 37 00:02:40.970 --> 00:02:46.570 to find a way to identify the right accounts for us. So how do you get a 38 00:02:46.570 --> 00:02:49.820 list? Where do you go to get the list of the accounts to start with? And then 39 00:02:49.820 --> 00:02:54.540 what attributes air using to kind of like trim it down to a very small size? 40 00:02:54.540 --> 00:02:58.660 And what's that small size? See, that's an interesting thing you're raising, 41 00:02:58.660 --> 00:03:03.320 because I think too few people are actually talking about all of the work 42 00:03:03.320 --> 00:03:07.820 that lies behind in a PM account. Ah, lot of people are talking about, you 43 00:03:07.820 --> 00:03:12.590 know, set up the work cadences, contact people three times a day, set up a 44 00:03:12.590 --> 00:03:19.140 system, have a personalized message, but no one is talking about or not. A 45 00:03:19.140 --> 00:03:24.680 lot of people are talking about the huge work that goes into it. For me. 46 00:03:24.680 --> 00:03:29.970 It's been starting by mapping accounts. It's been the very first exercise was 47 00:03:29.970 --> 00:03:35.680 asking myself if I could have my dream knowledge on my target accounts? What 48 00:03:35.680 --> 00:03:40.580 10 questions? Would I have the answer? And not only that, for them to then be 49 00:03:40.580 --> 00:03:44.180 a potential account with me? What would their answers feed to these 10 50 00:03:44.180 --> 00:03:50.120 questions? So it could be, um, are you thinking that your company will have 51 00:03:50.130 --> 00:03:54.510 transactional growth in the future? If the answer is yes, it could be a 52 00:03:54.520 --> 00:03:59.300 potential account for me if the answer is no non potential, of course. But but 53 00:03:59.300 --> 00:04:03.520 doing that and mapping out the criteria that makes it a value fit for us was 54 00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:07.710 the first exercise that we started doing awesome. Where did you get the 55 00:04:07.710 --> 00:04:11.180 information from? Did you go and buy it from a certain source or is it stuff 56 00:04:11.180 --> 00:04:15.860 you already had in to see a company? CRM you started with? Well, it actually 57 00:04:15.860 --> 00:04:20.399 came down setting up a system. We had knowledge around the account store, 58 00:04:20.410 --> 00:04:25.800 many different places. So the first exercise was trying Thio accumulate all 59 00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:30.360 the knowledge and set it up in a system that would show us very methodically 60 00:04:30.740 --> 00:04:36.360 which accounts were the high potential accounts. Other than that, we started 61 00:04:36.360 --> 00:04:41.800 implementing questionnaires in our campaigns. If we did weapon as we would 62 00:04:41.800 --> 00:04:47.430 include the questions sign up forms, we would include the questions online. We 63 00:04:47.430 --> 00:04:50.950 would ask the questions and then some instances we would have third party 64 00:04:50.950 --> 00:04:56.120 vendors actually ask the questions for us and and then build surveys upon it. 65 00:04:56.130 --> 00:04:59.490 Yeah, that's interesting. So it sounds like it's mostly internal sources kind 66 00:04:59.490 --> 00:05:03.300 of all over the company. You kind of gathering together and then using 67 00:05:03.310 --> 00:05:07.880 gathering more information with surveys in a lot of different places. Yeah, the 68 00:05:07.880 --> 00:05:11.260 one thing I'm wrestling with is a market reason. I'm thinking about how 69 00:05:11.260 --> 00:05:13.700 am I going to do this myself? Because it's something we want to do it. Sweet 70 00:05:13.700 --> 00:05:18.350 fish. We've done it to a large degree with podcasting, but something I'm 71 00:05:18.350 --> 00:05:22.150 looking to scale. One thing I think about is like Okay, well, how is this 72 00:05:22.150 --> 00:05:26.190 repeatable? Because you've gone through this process once. Did you go through 73 00:05:26.190 --> 00:05:29.360 the process and you're like, Okay, now I can do the same thing over again 74 00:05:29.360 --> 00:05:35.450 Quarterly? Or is it something where you can automate part of this process and 75 00:05:35.450 --> 00:05:40.630 gathering the information now? Well, I can automate part of the process. I 76 00:05:40.640 --> 00:05:44.560 mean, this was the foundation, so of course, we combine it with third party 77 00:05:44.560 --> 00:05:50.150 data and and one party data, First party data. So we have a system that 78 00:05:50.150 --> 00:05:54.960 then ranks the account the way we make it scalable is we see patterns that 79 00:05:54.960 --> 00:06:00.830 score their accounts, and that means we get a ratio. So maybe we'll have 30 80 00:06:00.840 --> 00:06:05.420 accounts the first year. And then in doing our research around the vertical, 81 00:06:05.420 --> 00:06:09.240 the challenge that they have when we see another account coming up, that's 82 00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:13.070 within the same vertical that's experiencing the same challenge. We 83 00:06:13.070 --> 00:06:17.380 have the framework that we can apply, and we have the USPS that we can apply. 84 00:06:17.390 --> 00:06:21.480 And I mean, everything is a training. So when you have the data and people 85 00:06:21.480 --> 00:06:24.890 start acting on it and you get your little conveyor built from the 86 00:06:24.890 --> 00:06:29.640 processes and the alignments. Then people know which part they play in the 87 00:06:29.640 --> 00:06:34.740 conveyor built, and that means it's available, I think. Okay, so you have a 88 00:06:34.740 --> 00:06:38.920 system set up to do this regularly now, and you have the right accounts in 89 00:06:38.920 --> 00:06:42.380 front of you. How many accounts are usually you trying to go after at a 90 00:06:42.380 --> 00:06:45.860 time? Or you trying to go after a lot programmatically and bring them in as 91 00:06:45.860 --> 00:06:50.400 they show, you know, signals that they're ready to buy. What kind of 92 00:06:50.400 --> 00:06:51.360 route do you go from there? 93 00:06:52.740 --> 00:06:56.600 So we haven't automated approach that looks at the programmatic account, so 94 00:06:56.600 --> 00:07:01.190 they will cast the net wide. And then we'll use the data from there. And then 95 00:07:01.190 --> 00:07:06.520 we filter it down thio smaller and smaller segments of accounts. And from 96 00:07:06.520 --> 00:07:11.250 there it's It's a teamwork between sales marketing. Str to to figure out 97 00:07:11.250 --> 00:07:16.340 which ones do we want to go all in on? We have different scoring, so we have 98 00:07:16.340 --> 00:07:20.260 different place that we run for the different scores. So it could be 99 00:07:20.260 --> 00:07:24.700 everything from a one too few campaign where we target some accounts together, 100 00:07:24.710 --> 00:07:29.950 and then the 1 to 1 environment where we built separate landing pages and 101 00:07:29.950 --> 00:07:34.380 separate flows and send gifts and all of this. So that's kind of an 102 00:07:34.380 --> 00:07:38.500 interesting distinction and something that's new to me. In this particular 103 00:07:38.500 --> 00:07:41.800 interview, I keep learning a little nuances of a B M, and you talked about 104 00:07:41.810 --> 00:07:46.510 like a one to many in a 1 to 1 campaign. Can you, for me and for the audience, 105 00:07:46.520 --> 00:07:49.760 tell us like, What's the difference between one too many? Like, what are 106 00:07:49.760 --> 00:07:53.440 some examples of that? And then one toe, one where you're executing? What's an 107 00:07:53.440 --> 00:07:58.570 example of that? Well, within our system, it could be, um, won. Too many 108 00:07:58.570 --> 00:08:02.730 campaign could be within a vertical that we want to target. It could be 109 00:08:02.730 --> 00:08:06.780 accounts that are picked by us and maybe a partner that wants to target 110 00:08:06.780 --> 00:08:12.360 the same accounts. It would be between fall and eight accounts. Typically, you 111 00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:16.890 can do more, I think, but we do between foreign aid accounts together that we 112 00:08:16.890 --> 00:08:22.740 focus on, and then typically they would have the same challenges or the same 113 00:08:22.740 --> 00:08:28.750 kind of system installed so they would have at least a seven or eight of the 114 00:08:28.750 --> 00:08:32.570 same parameters in common, so we could build the campaign from there and then 115 00:08:32.570 --> 00:08:38.080 do minor personalization on it. And then when you follow up on the campaign, 116 00:08:38.090 --> 00:08:43.390 you then become personalized toe a higher degree. And then we have the 1 117 00:08:43.390 --> 00:08:48.200 to 1 campaigns where we use a lot of time building a campaign for specific 118 00:08:48.200 --> 00:08:53.160 company, addressing their specific pain points and tailoring an entire universe 119 00:08:53.160 --> 00:08:57.270 just to them simply because we believe that we can add a lot of value to their 120 00:08:57.270 --> 00:09:01.640 company and vice versa. Okay, so let me see if I understand this, right? You 121 00:09:01.640 --> 00:09:05.790 know, one too many campaign. If I were targeting, let's say hospitals, I'd be 122 00:09:05.800 --> 00:09:10.660 targeting hospitals. Maybe I narrow it down the biggest hospitals within the 123 00:09:10.660 --> 00:09:14.460 top 10% of hospitals. One too many campaign might look like me doing a 124 00:09:14.460 --> 00:09:18.760 direct mail campaign and maybe gifts, and it might be personalizing it with, 125 00:09:18.760 --> 00:09:22.110 like, their name and hospital name and stuff. But really, it's kind of the 126 00:09:22.110 --> 00:09:26.820 same collateral I'm sending thio. Everybody is much and is personalized. 127 00:09:26.820 --> 00:09:31.030 But the difference in a 1 to 1 campaign, I think out one hospital I know exactly 128 00:09:31.030 --> 00:09:34.260 who that contact is, and I find them on Twitter and I find them on LinkedIn. I 129 00:09:34.260 --> 00:09:39.370 find out they're a fan of a specific sports team, and I'm sending them gifts 130 00:09:39.370 --> 00:09:42.390 about that sports team. Right? That would be a difference between a one to 131 00:09:42.390 --> 00:09:46.460 many, versus a 1 to 1 is I'm customizing it to the fullest degree 132 00:09:46.460 --> 00:09:50.270 that I can for that one individual or maybe multiple individuals within the 133 00:09:50.270 --> 00:09:54.360 one account. Is that is that kind of idea? Yeah, that's that's perfectly 134 00:09:54.360 --> 00:09:58.330 explained. I mean, in the ones. If you, of course, you would also have a 135 00:09:58.330 --> 00:10:02.070 personalized solution to their exact challenge. And that way your research 136 00:10:02.070 --> 00:10:07.460 would be about the challenge itself. It is a with 1 to 18 p. M. But it's also 137 00:10:07.460 --> 00:10:13.370 around the organizational set up of the account. It's about the people who were 138 00:10:13.370 --> 00:10:19.040 there. It's, um, instead of having the 4 to 18 accounts, you have 4 to 18 139 00:10:19.040 --> 00:10:23.300 people. You might be working on that account. That's so good. I often think 140 00:10:23.300 --> 00:10:26.290 about, like, just job hunting, right? We all know, like if you're gonna be a 141 00:10:26.290 --> 00:10:30.870 successful job hunter, it's better to take the approach of the one the one 142 00:10:30.870 --> 00:10:34.660 right 55 companies that you really wanna work for and create essentially 143 00:10:34.660 --> 00:10:37.970 campaigns for each one of those companies knowing that that's gonna 144 00:10:37.970 --> 00:10:42.310 lead the more success than spraying and praying. But, you know, sending out 145 00:10:42.310 --> 00:10:45.660 your resume to a few 100 different companies is just not gonna work well, 146 00:10:45.940 --> 00:10:49.640 so it's kind of like that, But for business here, Yeah, yeah, And in my 147 00:10:49.640 --> 00:10:53.280 opinion, I mean, nobody's I don't I think like the environment is also 148 00:10:53.280 --> 00:10:59.920 changing. So the GDP are restrictions and and Google moving away third party 149 00:10:59.930 --> 00:11:05.330 cookies. It also makes it a lot more difficult to actually do this spray and 150 00:11:05.330 --> 00:11:08.770 pray because you have your email database. What are you going to do when 151 00:11:08.770 --> 00:11:12.360 that grows old and stale? If you don't have new emails, you can buy them. 152 00:11:12.840 --> 00:11:18.440 Quality is, you know, maybe not the best. Always you can. You can be lucky. 153 00:11:18.450 --> 00:11:24.060 I'm not a fan of buying contact, as you can probably tell, but it's beginning 154 00:11:24.060 --> 00:11:29.540 to to get harder and harder. Thio drive other kinds of campaigns and now you 155 00:11:29.540 --> 00:11:33.900 have the option with them companies like siendo, so where you can send 156 00:11:33.900 --> 00:11:38.300 gifts to send the gift you actually collect the GDP are compliant. Home 157 00:11:38.300 --> 00:11:43.620 address. It makes a lot of sense. I'm kind of with you and not buying contact 158 00:11:43.620 --> 00:11:47.760 records in order to spam them, you know, and just mass mail them because that 159 00:11:47.770 --> 00:11:51.100 wouldn't work here. Whatever email provider using is going to kick you out 160 00:11:51.100 --> 00:11:55.370 for that. I'm sure there's some that don't, but I am a fan of buying some 161 00:11:55.370 --> 00:11:59.060 list just to narrow down your target. So you understand what the accounts are 162 00:11:59.440 --> 00:12:02.180 like. Even recently, I discovered crunch base, and I'm sure everybody 163 00:12:02.180 --> 00:12:05.820 listening, like do the crunch bases old days. And I'm like for a B two c market. 164 00:12:05.820 --> 00:12:09.510 And I'm like what? I could go and buy a whole list and then use the parameters 165 00:12:09.510 --> 00:12:13.420 to narrow it down to the top 100. Not that I would go on email them, but I'm 166 00:12:13.420 --> 00:12:18.020 like, Well, I could start following them on LinkedIn and engaging with 167 00:12:18.020 --> 00:12:21.050 their content may be sending them an invite to come be a guest on this 168 00:12:21.050 --> 00:12:26.220 podcast. That's not spammy, but it certainly gives me a head start versus 169 00:12:26.230 --> 00:12:29.850 our database. Probably only 30,000 contacts and like there's probably more 170 00:12:30.340 --> 00:12:34.110 that I'm still trying to figure out how to get new people onto our contact 171 00:12:34.110 --> 00:12:37.890 lists because I don't have the fancy software that shows me buying signals 172 00:12:37.890 --> 00:12:41.250 and indicates what they're searching. I don't know how people do that, but 173 00:12:41.260 --> 00:12:45.230 apparently that's what a terminus and demand base. And what's the other one? 174 00:12:45.230 --> 00:12:48.380 Six cents? They all do that. Do you use one of those, By the way, like one of 175 00:12:48.380 --> 00:12:53.870 those big a BM software packages? Which one we dio? I don't know if I'm allowed 176 00:12:53.870 --> 00:12:57.290 to tell you what you wanted. To be honest, like that's cool. That's cool. 177 00:12:57.300 --> 00:13:01.380 But you use one of them, uh, something You do use that software, and I 178 00:13:01.380 --> 00:13:04.720 understand like there's a big difference in being B to C and P two p. 179 00:13:04.720 --> 00:13:09.300 So narrowing found your field would be much more difficult. B to C. I would 180 00:13:09.300 --> 00:13:13.000 imagine. Yeah, I feel like I struck gold moving from B to C, where you 181 00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:16.030 literally don't know anything about the target audience. That's why we use 182 00:13:16.030 --> 00:13:20.370 personas a lot B to C. But in b two b, I'm like, Oh my gosh, there's so much 183 00:13:20.370 --> 00:13:24.720 more information. This is amazing like I literally confined the name and the 184 00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:28.850 email and maybe the phone number of the exact person that I know needs to make 185 00:13:28.850 --> 00:13:34.160 the decision that just changes the game. But I can give you want you can. If you 186 00:13:34.160 --> 00:13:39.580 don't have the demand base or whatever system you're using, you can sit up in 187 00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:43.760 a PM report on LinkedIn. Now, really, that's cool. I have I have another 188 00:13:43.760 --> 00:13:47.110 interview coming up with LinkedIn so I'll probably dive into deep into that 189 00:13:47.110 --> 00:13:50.750 with her. Yeah, coming up. It will prioritize your accounts for you. So 190 00:13:50.750 --> 00:13:54.570 you will be able to see, like, how many people within one account from all of 191 00:13:54.570 --> 00:13:58.920 the activities you're doing on victim and then it will raise your accounts 192 00:13:58.920 --> 00:14:02.680 for you so you don't have to do that job. That's amazing. We use hub spot, 193 00:14:02.680 --> 00:14:05.390 so I'm like, I know those integrate, So I'm gonna I'm still looking into how 194 00:14:05.390 --> 00:14:08.980 those work Hence the syriza I'm It's a learning Siri's and I'm on a journey to 195 00:14:08.980 --> 00:14:13.990 figure out how this all goes. So you're doing programmatic your trickling down 196 00:14:13.990 --> 00:14:17.910 accounts to try to figure out and where you're working hand in hand with sales 197 00:14:17.910 --> 00:14:22.250 to figure out which ones are worth following up with on the 1 to 1 198 00:14:22.250 --> 00:14:26.700 approach. Okay, so what is the cadence? The exact cadence of these? You 199 00:14:26.700 --> 00:14:29.210 probably have different place for this order. Some of the place for this one. 200 00:14:29.210 --> 00:14:33.210 The one approach and what signifies doing different plays is a different 201 00:14:33.210 --> 00:14:37.520 markets or different ways. That they came, came down the funnel. That 202 00:14:37.520 --> 00:14:41.810 signifies a different play. But we like, of course, the different way they came 203 00:14:41.810 --> 00:14:46.720 down into the funnel. We will score in different ways, so we will find out. Is 204 00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:50.960 it more important for us that somebody has been two hours on our page? Or is 205 00:14:50.960 --> 00:14:54.160 it more important that they've downloaded an asset and then we'll give 206 00:14:54.160 --> 00:15:00.250 them a grade if you want to? And then we have that combined with our final 207 00:15:00.250 --> 00:15:05.630 stages, where you can see Oh, is it a magazine qualified lead that we got in? 208 00:15:05.630 --> 00:15:11.040 Is it a sales qualified lead? How have they been rated? And it's the 209 00:15:11.040 --> 00:15:16.030 combination of those. So if you have a nurture lead, of course, what will step 210 00:15:16.030 --> 00:15:22.020 in would be an account based nurture program on dedications that goes with 211 00:15:22.020 --> 00:15:26.940 that. If It's a marketing qualified lead, but they have very, very high 212 00:15:26.940 --> 00:15:32.420 schools on both first party, third party intent data and the actions that 213 00:15:32.420 --> 00:15:38.190 we see them take recently. Then we'll we'll put them into the pile of people, 214 00:15:38.190 --> 00:15:42.300 will go. Okay, Maybe we have to have a one to many approach on this one. Maybe 215 00:15:42.300 --> 00:15:47.110 we have to have a personalized 1 to 1 and the personalized once one could be 216 00:15:47.110 --> 00:15:51.540 anything from the universe where we have the landing pages is also setting 217 00:15:51.540 --> 00:15:57.710 up a conversational flow with our S Diaz or a ES and me helping them to 218 00:15:57.720 --> 00:16:01.330 design a journey. That's kind of interesting. So essentially, you have 219 00:16:01.330 --> 00:16:04.600 to react to what's coming down. You know, stuff comes down, you're like 220 00:16:04.600 --> 00:16:08.170 Okay, well, we have this group of leads, some of these air oneto one Looks like 221 00:16:08.180 --> 00:16:11.420 we have some trends in this one. Well, that's just gonna have to be a one to 222 00:16:11.420 --> 00:16:15.410 many. So you're essentially your timeto react toe. What's coming from your your 223 00:16:15.410 --> 00:16:19.410 programmatic work? That right? You know, that's why the process and the set up 224 00:16:19.410 --> 00:16:23.600 and the system is so important because everyone needs to know their place If 225 00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:28.120 you have to execute fast. I mean, I could plan ahead from some of the data 226 00:16:28.120 --> 00:16:33.380 that we have that we want to do a 1 to 1 campaign on some, and I will. But if 227 00:16:33.380 --> 00:16:37.270 we have something coming in that shows intent now, then we need to get it 228 00:16:37.280 --> 00:16:42.190 launched. Now that makes a lot of sense. What has been some of the learnings 229 00:16:42.190 --> 00:16:46.110 you've had working with sales? That's some of the hard things, some of the 230 00:16:46.120 --> 00:16:49.720 things you've learned and have overcome that you would want to share with 231 00:16:49.720 --> 00:16:51.150 someone who's just getting into it now. 232 00:16:52.340 --> 00:16:58.650 I mean, the first thing you have to be able to establish is that sales and 233 00:16:58.650 --> 00:17:02.740 marketing are lined, and I know everyone will say this, but it means 234 00:17:02.740 --> 00:17:08.260 that we are equal stakeholders and we are equal participants in conversations, 235 00:17:08.260 --> 00:17:14.440 and we feed in both data but also opinion on an equal basis. Also, the 236 00:17:14.440 --> 00:17:18.910 alignment that we are, in fact shifting from a quantitative approach to a 237 00:17:18.910 --> 00:17:24.329 qualitative approach. Everyone needs to agree on this. E don't agree on this. 238 00:17:24.329 --> 00:17:30.600 It's gonna be the old marketing sales fight like because this is a long, long 239 00:17:30.600 --> 00:17:35.420 game. It's not a short game, and there will be times when your sales guys will 240 00:17:35.420 --> 00:17:41.310 be like the funnel is not big enough. But if it's qualified enough, then it's 241 00:17:41.310 --> 00:17:46.680 good. Yeah, and do you find that there, like, in a word, complaining often that 242 00:17:46.680 --> 00:17:50.170 there's not enough leads to call? Or do you find it's the other way around like 243 00:17:50.170 --> 00:17:54.110 they have too many? Well, it comes in waves. I mean, I'm lucky I have a 244 00:17:54.110 --> 00:18:00.860 fantastic sales team and they open and they are supporting the BM approach. I 245 00:18:00.860 --> 00:18:05.720 mean, during Covert 19, which has been going on as we all know. Of course, 246 00:18:05.720 --> 00:18:11.080 there's been some push out since, um, delays. And and during those sort of 247 00:18:11.080 --> 00:18:16.920 waves, of course, they'll be like we want somewhere to work on, because it's 248 00:18:16.920 --> 00:18:22.530 frustrating. But then all of a sudden cove, it was the thing that we had to 249 00:18:22.530 --> 00:18:29.010 get used to and a huge wave rolled back. So one thing that's always been kind of 250 00:18:29.020 --> 00:18:34.290 a difficulty with marketing, at least for me, is that I never felt like I 251 00:18:34.290 --> 00:18:39.310 could satisfy sales. There was either not enough Lietz even playing the 252 00:18:39.310 --> 00:18:42.870 quantity game. It's like there's not enough fleets. We called them all. 253 00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:46.590 Whether they called them on time or not is a different question, right? Or if I 254 00:18:46.590 --> 00:18:49.560 did provide enough leads, they were just never high enough. Quality leads. 255 00:18:49.570 --> 00:18:52.240 They're drowning in Leeds and they're not converting right because they have 256 00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:57.380 too many weeks now, Would you say the A B M addresses addresses that it fixes 257 00:18:57.380 --> 00:19:01.910 that to some degree? It does because it moves the conversation beyond the 258 00:19:01.910 --> 00:19:07.410 funnel. I mean, all of a sudden when you're allowing marketing to talk about 259 00:19:07.420 --> 00:19:11.940 the strategy in a different way, and you're also allowing them to have 260 00:19:11.940 --> 00:19:18.340 strategic insight into the market into the market coverage addressable market 261 00:19:18.350 --> 00:19:23.590 into the challenges into everything that makes up the challenges we want to 262 00:19:23.590 --> 00:19:28.090 solve this marketeers, it means that we're able to talk about the market in 263 00:19:28.090 --> 00:19:34.490 a different way. And I think ultimately the sales guys don't really care if the 264 00:19:34.490 --> 00:19:38.550 funnel is low. If I understand the market will enough and and can build a 265 00:19:38.550 --> 00:19:42.200 plan to change that, are they more involved with you on making marketing 266 00:19:42.200 --> 00:19:47.660 decisions? As a result of this? They are. They helped me build the campaigns 267 00:19:47.660 --> 00:19:52.220 they helped me establish in partnerships the partners helped me 268 00:19:52.220 --> 00:19:58.580 with my content. They all educate me in their fields of expertise, and it is a 269 00:19:58.580 --> 00:20:03.290 heavy software business that I'm in. And I will admit When I graduated from 270 00:20:03.290 --> 00:20:08.230 my communication and design study, I was not thinking that I should go into 271 00:20:08.230 --> 00:20:13.600 financial software, and I have no idea what the software could do and couldn't 272 00:20:13.600 --> 00:20:19.440 do. But they educate me every day and they help me, and they fully invested 273 00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:24.250 in me becoming a partner that can can leverage their knowledge to build a bit 274 00:20:24.250 --> 00:20:27.800 of pipeline for them. So that's one of my favorite parts about marketing is 275 00:20:27.800 --> 00:20:32.020 you get a chance to learn so many different things, and industries never 276 00:20:32.020 --> 00:20:35.040 really gets born. There's always something new to learn marketing. And 277 00:20:35.050 --> 00:20:37.870 if learning new industries wasn't enough for you, it's kind of like, Well, 278 00:20:37.870 --> 00:20:40.470 the technology is always changing studies. I was always There's always 279 00:20:40.470 --> 00:20:44.250 something new to learn. Another book to read. It is interesting that sales 280 00:20:44.250 --> 00:20:47.350 essentially helps you design the marketing campaigns, and I wonder, Do 281 00:20:47.350 --> 00:20:51.420 you spend a lot of time helping them design their sales campaigns and some 282 00:20:51.420 --> 00:20:55.880 of their scripts to collaborate with them? A lot on the sales process. I do. 283 00:20:55.880 --> 00:21:00.600 I think mostly what I I take care of in that sense is because they're all very 284 00:21:00.600 --> 00:21:05.450 professional. It's have we thought about the flow? Will we gate on gate 285 00:21:05.450 --> 00:21:10.580 the asset? How do we track this? So they have a very good understanding of 286 00:21:10.590 --> 00:21:15.490 what message needs to be served, when and why and how. But I make sure that 287 00:21:15.490 --> 00:21:20.350 all of the framework is in place and that nothing falls through two chairs. 288 00:21:20.350 --> 00:21:26.270 And in that sense, it's also like if I built as my sales guys, can you build a 289 00:21:26.270 --> 00:21:32.700 landing page? They'd be like, Hmm. So me doing all of the data and helping 290 00:21:32.700 --> 00:21:37.590 them with the landing page is helping them to capture the data. That's my 291 00:21:37.590 --> 00:21:42.190 most important job. A fantastic How are you measuring success as you work on 292 00:21:42.190 --> 00:21:45.990 these campaigns like, what is sales looking at? To know that you're 293 00:21:45.990 --> 00:21:49.100 successful, What is what are you looking at? The make sure sales is 294 00:21:49.100 --> 00:21:53.890 successful. It's been a learning curve. I mean, we've had a couple of different 295 00:21:53.890 --> 00:21:58.380 one toe ones campaigns now, and of course, we're looking at the content 296 00:21:58.390 --> 00:22:02.610 build up where we've had contact white space. So if we've needed new context 297 00:22:02.610 --> 00:22:06.590 within an account, then we've looked at the contact build up from this campaign. 298 00:22:06.600 --> 00:22:13.080 It could also be number of new visitors online, people searching for us. And, 299 00:22:13.090 --> 00:22:17.480 of course, in the follow up process, my STRS and A is a heavily involved, so it 300 00:22:17.480 --> 00:22:21.910 will also be responses back. And I think one of the first campaigns we 301 00:22:21.910 --> 00:22:26.390 launched it took six months and then we had the target account in the pipeline. 302 00:22:26.400 --> 00:22:29.870 So that was a huge success, and it shows you that you could do it. But I 303 00:22:29.870 --> 00:22:33.990 think you need Thio. You need to monitor it always and change it up 304 00:22:34.000 --> 00:22:38.940 always. So sometimes it might not be successful, but in this case definitely 305 00:22:38.940 --> 00:22:43.950 was. And one last question I have for you is that as I evaluate account based 306 00:22:43.950 --> 00:22:47.550 marketing and I'm reading books and I'm learning, it sounds like a very 307 00:22:47.560 --> 00:22:53.420 expensive endeavor to get started with, just to get an idea like, how much time 308 00:22:53.420 --> 00:22:57.440 did it take to get to this system that you're in now? And I'm sure it's not 309 00:22:57.440 --> 00:23:00.160 done like there's probably still new phases you're trying to implement, but 310 00:23:00.160 --> 00:23:03.300 to get to where you're at now. Like, how much time would it take to 311 00:23:03.310 --> 00:23:06.660 implement roughly for a company that hasn't done any of this yet, and about 312 00:23:06.660 --> 00:23:10.850 how much money does it cost? Like five figures, six figures. This is a seven 313 00:23:10.850 --> 00:23:14.790 figure like implementation. I'm sure it's very different for different 314 00:23:14.790 --> 00:23:17.940 companies, but I'm just trying to get a feel for like, what? Does this actually 315 00:23:17.940 --> 00:23:23.050 take to pull off? Yeah, I guess it depends on the set up for me. It took 316 00:23:23.840 --> 00:23:28.250 10 months approximately to build up to where we could launch our Thursday PM 317 00:23:28.250 --> 00:23:32.700 campaign. Then from that, of course, making sure that the process and the 318 00:23:32.700 --> 00:23:37.600 campaigns was scalable, I would be able to launch one very personalized like 319 00:23:37.600 --> 00:23:43.330 every month and then do smaller campaigns quite regularly again, 320 00:23:43.340 --> 00:23:47.890 depending on what the dates that would show us. Eso. That's one thing when we 321 00:23:47.890 --> 00:23:52.050 talk about the pricing, it's been difficult because, of course, we had 322 00:23:52.440 --> 00:23:58.370 Cem global tools that were available to US expensive tools as well. But I would 323 00:23:58.370 --> 00:24:03.070 think that you could get started with the A B M report on LinkedIn, and if 324 00:24:03.070 --> 00:24:07.280 you have hot spot, you could build landing pages. So I think your most 325 00:24:07.280 --> 00:24:11.150 valuable asset here is the knowledge of the challenges and how you solve them 326 00:24:11.150 --> 00:24:15.140 with the account. So it wouldn't say that it has to be expensive. It'll so 327 00:24:15.140 --> 00:24:19.770 it doesn't have to be in the six figure realm, and I have started noticing, and 328 00:24:19.780 --> 00:24:23.140 an interview I did yesterday actually was somebody who did it for, I think, 329 00:24:23.140 --> 00:24:26.060 under five grand. And most of that was that spent. I think you just use Excel. 330 00:24:26.060 --> 00:24:29.880 She's tried everything and just picked up the accounts of created some robust, 331 00:24:29.890 --> 00:24:35.830 personalized campaigns for these people. So it is possible. But I'm still trying 332 00:24:35.830 --> 00:24:41.310 to get a scope of what it is for most people. And then again, my kind of my 333 00:24:41.310 --> 00:24:43.940 goal is to learn this. But I'm trying to figure out, like, what is a good 334 00:24:43.940 --> 00:24:47.660 small campaign look like? Medium sized campaign, a big campaign, those air 335 00:24:48.040 --> 00:24:53.350 questions I've yet toe the answer, and I'm still my journey figuring out no, 336 00:24:53.350 --> 00:24:56.630 it makes sense. It also depends If you're doing programmatic, then that's 337 00:24:56.640 --> 00:25:01.950 massively expensive. Eso. If that's where you're starting, then uh, then 338 00:25:01.950 --> 00:25:05.790 that's an expensive journey to undertake off course. social spend can 339 00:25:05.790 --> 00:25:10.000 be what you wanted to be. I think there's a lot of ways to optimize the 340 00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:14.950 way you do a B M on social, especially linked in or the way you sort of do the 341 00:25:14.950 --> 00:25:19.690 retargeting sequences on Facebook you can you can optimize that there are so 342 00:25:19.690 --> 00:25:24.060 many brilliant is and be tools available, a swell that will make life 343 00:25:24.070 --> 00:25:29.200 easier for you. Generate your own white papers and, you know, one click with 344 00:25:29.200 --> 00:25:33.660 the designer things like that. So you do have a lot of resource is I think 345 00:25:33.660 --> 00:25:38.420 the most expensive thing to acquire is, um, the target accounts. The knowledge 346 00:25:38.420 --> 00:25:43.740 around the target accounts for me getting the personalized content that I 347 00:25:43.740 --> 00:25:48.530 need that has been the most expensive post. Yeah, that's what we started to 348 00:25:48.530 --> 00:25:55.010 find out. So I've been talked Thio, the founders of those big companies. Yet 349 00:25:55.010 --> 00:25:59.680 like Terminus and Demand Base, I will. That's part of this Siri's. I'm looking 350 00:25:59.680 --> 00:26:02.380 forward to it because finding out the ins and outs of like, okay, like, what 351 00:26:02.380 --> 00:26:05.140 are we really getting will be purchased software this big, like how much more 352 00:26:05.140 --> 00:26:08.350 effective doesn't make us? I'm sure it's pretty good. I mean and companies 353 00:26:08.350 --> 00:26:11.280 are investing in a pretty heavily. Yeah, And then you have the small hacks that 354 00:26:11.280 --> 00:26:16.510 nobody really tells you about, like generating a tracking link on your own, 355 00:26:16.510 --> 00:26:20.280 and that you can see it in Google analytics. So whenever you something or 356 00:26:20.280 --> 00:26:23.910 you share something and think, then you used to attract link and you can see it 357 00:26:23.910 --> 00:26:27.850 in Google Analytics. Things like that. A small hex. But I don't think that 358 00:26:27.850 --> 00:26:32.690 people actually remember to generate attracting code for Lincoln to see if 359 00:26:32.700 --> 00:26:36.940 people later clicked on the link without responding more. I mean, Google 360 00:26:36.940 --> 00:26:39.750 makes it really hard. It's literally like six form fields you have to fill 361 00:26:39.750 --> 00:26:43.270 out every time you want to create that. You keep tracking parameter right. 362 00:26:43.740 --> 00:26:46.470 Luckily, there's some tools out there. They're making it easier and doing it 363 00:26:46.470 --> 00:26:50.840 automatically like come spot. But it's all technical things. We gotta learn 364 00:26:50.840 --> 00:26:54.680 how to implement and get better at Maria. It has been so fun toe learn 365 00:26:54.680 --> 00:26:59.090 about your A B M journey. Where can people go toe, learn more from you and 366 00:26:59.090 --> 00:27:02.530 connect with you online? If they have follow up questions, well, they can 367 00:27:02.530 --> 00:27:05.840 definitely find me on LinkedIn I'm always answering questions there. And 368 00:27:05.840 --> 00:27:13.100 they can also see some of the posts that ideo. Yep. And if I have it here 369 00:27:13.100 --> 00:27:20.040 in front of me But if you go to Lincoln dot com slash i am and it is slash m a 370 00:27:20.040 --> 00:27:30.680 r i a e l e f s d is her u r l So that's where you can find Maria. I'm so 371 00:27:30.680 --> 00:27:34.300 impressed by the way you say my last name. Fantastic. I'm glad I didn't mess 372 00:27:34.300 --> 00:27:40.630 it up. Thank you again. So much for joining me on the show today. Maria, if 373 00:27:40.630 --> 00:27:43.980 you're getting value from this podcast, you are absolutely going toe love our 374 00:27:43.980 --> 00:27:47.730 weekly newsletter. In each email, I share something that you can do toe 375 00:27:47.730 --> 00:27:52.050 love your team well, toe, hone your craft, the craft of marketing and to 376 00:27:52.050 --> 00:27:55.770 grow your leadership. Plus, there's a super funny video at the top of the 377 00:27:55.770 --> 00:27:59.080 landing page whenever you go to sign up for the newsletter. So go to sweet Fish 378 00:27:59.080 --> 00:28:05.780 media dot com slash newsletter and sign up today. Are you on Lincoln? That's a 379 00:28:05.780 --> 00:28:09.380 stupid question. Of course you're on LinkedIn here. Sweet fish. We've gone 380 00:28:09.390 --> 00:28:13.770 all in on the platform multiple people from our team are creating content 381 00:28:13.770 --> 00:28:18.190 there. Sometimes it's a funny gift. For many other times, it's a micro video or 382 00:28:18.190 --> 00:28:22.490 a slide deck. And sometimes it's just a regular old status update that shares 383 00:28:22.500 --> 00:28:26.620 their unique point of view on B two b marketing leadership or their job 384 00:28:26.620 --> 00:28:30.990 function were posting this content through their personal profile, not our 385 00:28:30.990 --> 00:28:35.240 company page. And it would warm my heart and soul if you connected with 386 00:28:35.250 --> 00:28:39.900 each of our evangelists, will be adding Mawr down the road. But for now, you 387 00:28:39.900 --> 00:28:44.150 should connect with Bill Reed, R C zero Kelsey Montgomery, our creative 388 00:28:44.150 --> 00:28:48.570 director, Dan Sanchez, our director of audience growth. Logan Lyles, our 389 00:28:48.570 --> 00:28:52.710 director of partnerships, and me, James Carberry. We're having a whole lot of 390 00:28:52.710 --> 00:28:56.200 fun on LinkedIn pretty much every single day on. We'd love for you to be 391 00:28:56.200 --> 00:28:56.760 a part of it.