Every Friday we share one non-obvious insight from your favorite creators in our newsletter.
Nov. 4, 2020

How Enterprise SaaS Startups Should Fundraise

The player is loading ...
B2B Growth

It’s hard enough being a startup. Try being a startup that has to create its own category.  

Not only do you have to convince investors of your idea, but you also have to prove to buyers that they have a problem that needs fixing. 

In other words, earning revenue for an early enterprise software startup is tough. Alex Rubalcava, founder of Stage Venture Partners, shares some expert advice on early-stage fundraising. 

He and John discuss…  

  • The characteristics of an ideal startup investment opportunity
  • Major pitfalls for early-stage SaaS startups to avoid
  • How startups are managing remote selling and fundraising 

Follow Alex on Twitter @alexrubalcava .  

This episode is hosted by John Grispon. Founder and Sales Coach at Early Revenue, as part of the #Revenue series on B2B Growth.  

You can find this interview, and many more, by subscribing to the B2B Growth Show on Apple Podcasts, on our website, or on Spotify. 

Transcript
WEBVTT 1 00:00:06.340 --> 00:00:13.380 very few people on planet Earth have the necessary skill sets to be founders 2 00:00:13.380 --> 00:00:18.440 of the companies that are developing that kind of software. Welcome to the 3 00:00:18.440 --> 00:00:22.900 revenue Siris on the B two B growth show. I'm your host, John Rissman, 4 00:00:22.910 --> 00:00:28.730 founder and sales coach at Early Revenue. So let's get going today. I'm 5 00:00:28.730 --> 00:00:35.360 here with Alex Rubalcaba, who is the co founder and managing partner at Stage 6 00:00:35.370 --> 00:00:39.320 Venture Partners. Welcome, Alex. Great to be here. John. Thank you for having 7 00:00:39.320 --> 00:00:45.940 me. Absolutely. Soto level set for our guests. Our guests are CEOs, revenue 8 00:00:45.940 --> 00:00:50.800 leaders and venture firms. And our purpose is to provide early stage tech 9 00:00:50.800 --> 00:00:55.410 founders and their sales leaders insights and best practices on two 10 00:00:55.410 --> 00:01:00.790 topics that are top of mind for most leaders. The how twos Off growing early 11 00:01:00.790 --> 00:01:05.720 state sales and fundraising. So, once again, thanks for being here, Alex. Why 12 00:01:05.720 --> 00:01:08.730 don't you tell us a little bit about your background? So we know who we're 13 00:01:08.730 --> 00:01:14.420 talking about today? Absolutely. So I founded my firm stage about five years 14 00:01:14.420 --> 00:01:19.380 ago. The firm invests in enterprise software startups, always at the seed 15 00:01:19.380 --> 00:01:23.650 level. So the first round of institutional capital that a startup is 16 00:01:23.660 --> 00:01:29.110 raising I focus on software companies. They're solving hard technical problems 17 00:01:29.120 --> 00:01:33.020 almost always at the application layer in a diverse set of industries, 18 00:01:33.030 --> 00:01:38.370 including, but not limited to things like e commerce, software, tools, 19 00:01:38.380 --> 00:01:43.050 healthcare and life sciences, and industrial and aerospace applications. 20 00:01:43.140 --> 00:01:49.510 I'm based in Los Angeles, where I lived all my life, and I started out out of 21 00:01:49.510 --> 00:01:53.200 college as an analyst at another venture firm here in town, called 22 00:01:53.210 --> 00:01:57.460 Anthem Venture Partners, which is still around and going strong, worked there 23 00:01:57.460 --> 00:02:02.760 for a number of years out of college and then left venture in early stage 24 00:02:02.760 --> 00:02:08.759 investing for a number of years and spent that time doing mostly investing 25 00:02:08.759 --> 00:02:13.430 in public markets, running a long, short, special situations oriented 26 00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:17.660 hedge fund. After a while, though, I decided that my true passion was back 27 00:02:17.670 --> 00:02:22.510 in venture capital and working with startups. When you buy companies on the 28 00:02:22.520 --> 00:02:25.460 New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ, they don't know who you are. They don't 29 00:02:25.460 --> 00:02:29.790 care that you own them, whereas in, uh, in startups, it's a little different. 30 00:02:29.790 --> 00:02:33.930 And I decided that that was where my interests lie. Awesome. And so when did 31 00:02:33.930 --> 00:02:41.870 you found stage what year? 2015 2015 So for founders that air listening, What's 32 00:02:41.870 --> 00:02:46.610 the approximate size of the fund? I'm currently investing out of my fund? 33 00:02:46.610 --> 00:02:52.610 Three, which is a $25 million fund? Awesome. And so for those that air in 34 00:02:52.610 --> 00:02:56.400 that early stage, that air they're hearing you perhaps the first time. 35 00:02:56.400 --> 00:03:00.940 What are the characteristics of an ideal start up for your fund? I'm 36 00:03:00.940 --> 00:03:04.960 looking down the list of those that you invested in, and it is. It is just an 37 00:03:04.960 --> 00:03:11.400 array from three D content management. Thio Customers, Success for law 38 00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:17.840 enforcement, Thio Data for Aerospace, Safer Drone deployments, Secure 39 00:03:17.840 --> 00:03:24.600 research platforms, sales support and the customer service Ai. Yeah, So what 40 00:03:24.610 --> 00:03:30.780 all of those things have in common is that they are software startups that 41 00:03:30.780 --> 00:03:36.390 are solving hard business problems that had never been able to be solved with 42 00:03:36.390 --> 00:03:42.150 software before they are taking cutting edge technology often apply, often 43 00:03:42.150 --> 00:03:46.320 applying artificial intelligence or machine learning and unlocking new 44 00:03:46.320 --> 00:03:51.860 capabilities. Many of the companies that you mentioned are also special in 45 00:03:51.860 --> 00:03:57.970 the sense that very few people on planet Earth have the necessary skill 46 00:03:57.970 --> 00:04:02.170 sets to be founders of the companies that are developing that kind of 47 00:04:02.170 --> 00:04:08.600 software, and many of my companies have very little to zero competition. They 48 00:04:08.600 --> 00:04:13.470 don't have other venture funded or other types of software companies that 49 00:04:13.480 --> 00:04:16.600 are competing with them for the attention of customers. And they 50 00:04:16.600 --> 00:04:20.070 actually have a different challenge when it comes to sales. And when it 51 00:04:20.070 --> 00:04:25.860 comes Thio entering a new market, which is, they have to convince buyers, too, 52 00:04:26.440 --> 00:04:30.350 trust software for the first time to solve a problem that they have always 53 00:04:30.350 --> 00:04:37.600 had. And that's a very unique risk profile it is. So is there a theme that 54 00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:40.930 permeates each of those? How are they going about? Because that's a very 55 00:04:40.930 --> 00:04:44.130 difficult conversation, right? Everybody has an innovative platform, 56 00:04:44.140 --> 00:04:48.910 but summer innovative in markets where there are someone to the left, someone 57 00:04:48.910 --> 00:04:54.440 to the right of them. How are are there themes that they're utilizing, Um, that 58 00:04:54.440 --> 00:04:58.320 you've been able to kind of notice the signal through the noise there? Yeah, 59 00:04:58.320 --> 00:05:02.510 there. There are a few things that tend to be important for companies like that. 60 00:05:02.520 --> 00:05:08.050 Number one is that you have to go directly to your customer. I think the 61 00:05:08.050 --> 00:05:13.980 supplies for most early stage companies, but nobody other than your company can 62 00:05:13.980 --> 00:05:18.750 sell your product, especially when it's a new product and you're creating a new 63 00:05:18.750 --> 00:05:23.500 category, no one else knows what to call you. Yet there often isn't a name 64 00:05:23.500 --> 00:05:27.840 for what this product is called. You know, we all know what customer 65 00:05:27.840 --> 00:05:31.630 relationship management software is today, and most buyers know what that 66 00:05:31.630 --> 00:05:36.590 is and know that they should probably have that. And they might think about 67 00:05:36.590 --> 00:05:39.620 Salesforce in one or two other companies when they think about that, 68 00:05:39.620 --> 00:05:45.030 but that that's already in people's minds. When you think about a company 69 00:05:45.030 --> 00:05:48.350 you mentioned, my customer service software company for law enforcement, 70 00:05:48.360 --> 00:05:52.160 Spider tech Spider Tech has created a completely new category. There is 71 00:05:52.160 --> 00:05:59.430 nobody else who does what Spider Tech does. There is no. In fact, we know 72 00:05:59.430 --> 00:06:04.240 there's no one who does it because they have won all of their contracts either 73 00:06:04.250 --> 00:06:08.470 on sole source contracting with government agencies, which is a hard 74 00:06:08.470 --> 00:06:13.560 thing to get the right to do yes or through our FPs. And when Spider Tech 75 00:06:13.560 --> 00:06:18.170 has gone through an RFP to win a customer award, no one else has ever 76 00:06:18.170 --> 00:06:24.540 answered the RFP. That's amazing, but how interesting. So when it comes to 77 00:06:24.540 --> 00:06:28.850 these investments, obviously you're looking for pretty unique solutions. 78 00:06:28.850 --> 00:06:32.480 And the risk profile is certainly is very different, one of the criteria or 79 00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:37.790 the metrics that you see when deciding on on investment at that early of a 80 00:06:37.790 --> 00:06:43.260 stage, Yes. So the critical part of that question that you just asked is at 81 00:06:43.260 --> 00:06:49.360 that early of a stage, because when I'm investing, a typical company is two 82 00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:55.080 founders, maybe and maybe two or three additional employees, and the company 83 00:06:55.080 --> 00:07:00.860 has been around for about a year. Usually at the time that I invest. They 84 00:07:00.870 --> 00:07:06.170 have received less than $1 million of invested capital, often far less than 85 00:07:06.170 --> 00:07:11.780 that, almost always from friends and family and angel investors. From time 86 00:07:11.780 --> 00:07:16.260 to time, they will have gone through an accelerator like Techstars, and 87 00:07:16.740 --> 00:07:22.090 everything is early. Everything is in the process of being formed, and some 88 00:07:22.090 --> 00:07:26.420 of the companies have no revenue at the time that I invest. Some have a handful 89 00:07:26.420 --> 00:07:31.420 of early pilots or customers, and so when I'm looking at these companies and 90 00:07:31.420 --> 00:07:36.200 when I'm evaluating among the many thousands that I see in a given year 91 00:07:36.200 --> 00:07:43.310 old, I'll see about 1400 startups that pitch me. I have to look at a bunch of 92 00:07:43.310 --> 00:07:48.100 questions, and I sort of distill it down to two sets of three questions. 93 00:07:48.110 --> 00:07:53.400 The top level questions are why you? Why now and why us? Why you is about 94 00:07:53.400 --> 00:07:57.880 why is this founder uniquely credible? Why now is a question about why is now 95 00:07:57.880 --> 00:08:02.980 the right time to be building this company and solving this problem using 96 00:08:02.980 --> 00:08:07.430 software? Why us is a question about why am I and why is my firm the right 97 00:08:07.430 --> 00:08:11.770 investor for this company? And then the second set of questions is basically a 98 00:08:11.770 --> 00:08:16.670 more detailed set about the Y. You question about the founder because the 99 00:08:16.670 --> 00:08:21.010 founder is the most important thing when evaluating a company like this and 100 00:08:21.020 --> 00:08:26.340 that set of questions is all about the three primary risks that a startup that 101 00:08:26.340 --> 00:08:31.810 young faces and that is, can you ship? Can you sell? Can you hire and it comes 102 00:08:31.810 --> 00:08:36.440 down to in this person in this team, ship software quickly, inexpensively 103 00:08:36.440 --> 00:08:42.890 and iterate as necessary. Can they sell? Can they convince somebody who is not 104 00:08:42.890 --> 00:08:47.150 their mother or their mother in law to pay them real money for the software? 105 00:08:47.540 --> 00:08:53.110 And can they hire? Can they convince really high quality people to quit jobs 106 00:08:53.120 --> 00:08:58.150 at big, prestigious companies that impress their friends and relatives to 107 00:08:58.150 --> 00:09:01.880 come work for a start up that nobody has ever heard of, often for a pay cut. 108 00:09:01.890 --> 00:09:05.900 Yes, I would say the majority of the time it's It's with a pay cut, right? 109 00:09:05.910 --> 00:09:13.770 So when you get these guys on, as as a portfolio company, how is it that I 110 00:09:13.770 --> 00:09:18.310 mean one of the tough parts? Right? Shipping? Typically for tech founders, 111 00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:21.170 that's what they're focused on, a typical focused on products. So getting 112 00:09:21.170 --> 00:09:25.670 out there and selling it unless you're unique. I like Mark Bernstein is 113 00:09:25.670 --> 00:09:30.990 usually a challenge, but they are typically founder. So how are you 114 00:09:30.990 --> 00:09:35.810 contributing to figuring out that early, uh, repeatable sale? How are you 115 00:09:35.810 --> 00:09:41.070 helping them? If it all with early stage sale, that's a That's a tough 116 00:09:41.080 --> 00:09:45.950 That's a tough thing. It is a tough thing, and a lot of the assessment and 117 00:09:45.950 --> 00:09:52.120 a lot of the plan depends on a few criteria about the product. Number one. 118 00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:57.260 What is the annual contract value? I tend to invest in high priced software 119 00:09:57.260 --> 00:10:01.550 so you will not see me investing in a lot of companies where the product cost 120 00:10:01.550 --> 00:10:05.660 $10 a month for user. Probably kind of part and parcel with enterprise 121 00:10:05.660 --> 00:10:08.730 software, right, if that's where you're investing. Yeah, there are a lot of 122 00:10:08.730 --> 00:10:14.750 really good bottoms up product led growth companies out there. But usually 123 00:10:14.740 --> 00:10:19.950 the difference between software companies that monetize like that is 124 00:10:20.440 --> 00:10:26.400 down to very small features. And there tends to be a lot of competition and a 125 00:10:26.400 --> 00:10:29.600 lot of new entrance at the seed stage. You know, there are 1000 companies that 126 00:10:29.600 --> 00:10:34.200 are trying to make incremental improvement over slack or zoom, and I 127 00:10:34.200 --> 00:10:39.330 find it very hard to decide super early on which of those air going to break 128 00:10:39.330 --> 00:10:44.020 out. So I didn't know if the companies that have annual contract values above 129 00:10:44.020 --> 00:10:50.940 10,000 per customer and I have a big cluster in the 10 to $40,000 range that 130 00:10:50.940 --> 00:10:56.680 generally sell through inside sales efforts, and I have a big cluster that 131 00:10:56.690 --> 00:11:02.040 are at annual contract values of over 100,000, which tend to have more of an 132 00:11:02.040 --> 00:11:07.890 outside sales model that would require in any year other than 2020 putting 133 00:11:07.900 --> 00:11:13.470 people on airplanes. Thio, go visit and sell person one day that will come back, 134 00:11:13.470 --> 00:11:16.760 of course. So a lot of it depends on those kind of questions, and a lot of 135 00:11:16.760 --> 00:11:20.640 it depends on the complexity of a deployment. You know, do we need to 136 00:11:20.640 --> 00:11:25.590 integrate with existing systems of any kind? Are their data assets that need 137 00:11:25.590 --> 00:11:30.720 to be loaded into the product in order for the product to have value how Maney 138 00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:37.440 users is required at an enterprise customer in order for that enterprise 139 00:11:37.450 --> 00:11:40.930 to receive value from the product? And when you think through those questions, 140 00:11:40.930 --> 00:11:44.770 you start to think, Okay, does outbound work here, or does it have to be some 141 00:11:44.770 --> 00:11:50.870 sort of a relationship based legion process? How much is required in pilots? 142 00:11:50.870 --> 00:11:56.550 What kind of discounts need too early customers? Those are all the questions 143 00:11:56.550 --> 00:12:02.390 that one figures out as you're you're entering sales for the first time, so 144 00:12:02.390 --> 00:12:04.850 you're helping them with their go to market model. You're helping them 145 00:12:04.850 --> 00:12:10.930 figure out the cadence and all of the associate ID processes that you'd have 146 00:12:10.930 --> 00:12:17.890 to go through in order to form that foundation. Then, from there, you know, 147 00:12:17.890 --> 00:12:22.640 it's it's a matter of getting out there and having conversations, right? So 148 00:12:22.640 --> 00:12:28.060 what about it looks like and it feels like you're gathering learnings from 149 00:12:28.060 --> 00:12:33.640 these from me that you're investing. And how much time do you invest? Do you 150 00:12:33.640 --> 00:12:38.150 allocate for guidance and coaching? You're probably learning a ton from 151 00:12:38.150 --> 00:12:43.950 these other early stage innovative companies. How are you applying that to, 152 00:12:43.960 --> 00:12:48.640 uh, the new founders that you bring on board? One of the great things about 153 00:12:48.650 --> 00:12:52.050 specializing on Lee an enterprise software is that there are 154 00:12:52.060 --> 00:12:57.360 commonalities across the companies that I invest in. And it's something that 155 00:12:57.370 --> 00:13:03.090 does allow for cross pollination. Azan Example. You You interviewed Mark 156 00:13:03.090 --> 00:13:09.480 Bernstein from Balto A. I the other day, and Balto has an outstanding customer 157 00:13:09.480 --> 00:13:13.790 success leader guy named Tyler Wonderlic, who has put in place um, 158 00:13:13.790 --> 00:13:20.330 really great processes and tools at Balto. And I recently put Tyler in 159 00:13:20.330 --> 00:13:25.060 touch with one of my earlier stage startups that is figuring out customer 160 00:13:25.060 --> 00:13:31.010 success for the first time and was able thio make the introduction and allow 161 00:13:31.010 --> 00:13:34.650 one of my companies that has really good tools to share those kind of tools 162 00:13:34.650 --> 00:13:37.990 with another company in the portfolio. And stuff like that happens all the 163 00:13:37.990 --> 00:13:42.100 time. I have a slack channel for my founders that allows them to ask 164 00:13:42.100 --> 00:13:47.700 questions of each other and Thio pose questions and talk about problems 165 00:13:47.710 --> 00:13:51.710 without me needing to be the bottleneck and the go between for them, and that 166 00:13:51.710 --> 00:13:56.140 has enabled a lot of collaboration and a lot of working together. That's very 167 00:13:56.140 --> 00:14:01.630 clever. When you come to a point where you found somewhere you begin a 168 00:14:01.630 --> 00:14:06.070 dialogue and there's answers. What's a typical cycle? Duration from initial 169 00:14:06.070 --> 00:14:12.480 conversation to term sheet? Usually that process involves an initial 170 00:14:12.480 --> 00:14:17.000 conversation used to be mostly in person meetings and its most bloom 171 00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:24.840 these days and the process that involves my taking time to spend with 172 00:14:25.340 --> 00:14:30.710 all of the other founders, not just the person who is leading fundraising. It's 173 00:14:30.710 --> 00:14:34.810 often the case that they designate this, that a startup team will designate the 174 00:14:34.810 --> 00:14:38.980 CEO, too. Handle all the fundraising, and I think it's important to get to 175 00:14:38.980 --> 00:14:43.320 know the other founders. Justus. Well, as I'm getting to know the person who's 176 00:14:43.330 --> 00:14:49.190 taking point on the deal e like to research competition, I get demos of 177 00:14:49.190 --> 00:14:54.650 products. I often am contacting people in my network who could be potential 178 00:14:54.650 --> 00:14:59.940 customers to meet with a startup and to give me their view as a buyer. I'm 179 00:14:59.940 --> 00:15:04.190 lucky that I'm lucky to have as investors and limited partners in my 180 00:15:04.190 --> 00:15:08.910 fund a number of people who operate substantial businesses, who are also 181 00:15:08.910 --> 00:15:14.730 very eager early adopters a tech and I get to get the benefit of their 182 00:15:14.730 --> 00:15:20.400 expertise and their perspective from their companies, and I then want to 183 00:15:20.400 --> 00:15:24.580 speak usually with customers or prospect of customers at the end of the 184 00:15:24.580 --> 00:15:29.910 process from the start of itself. And that whole process usually takes 4 to 7 185 00:15:29.910 --> 00:15:36.060 weeks to go through it. Usually, the end point is a term sheet. Often I end 186 00:15:36.060 --> 00:15:41.740 up interested in companies that other VCs, or not paying much attention to I, 187 00:15:41.750 --> 00:15:46.250 for whatever reason, make my decisions almost entirely independently. And I 188 00:15:46.260 --> 00:15:51.910 rarely if ever, find myself in competitive situations where other 189 00:15:51.910 --> 00:15:58.540 investors are chasing a deal, and that also ends up with an interesting side 190 00:15:58.540 --> 00:16:05.400 effect, which is I write checks of 300 to $500,000 or so in two companies that 191 00:16:05.400 --> 00:16:09.800 are raising anywhere from 1 to 3 million. So that means that I'm not the 192 00:16:09.800 --> 00:16:14.570 entire round and there need to be other investors alongside me, and if I often 193 00:16:14.580 --> 00:16:21.670 getting to conviction with a startup that is not having a lot of other BC's. 194 00:16:21.670 --> 00:16:24.870 Pay attention to them the moment I assign a term sheet. I didn't have to 195 00:16:24.870 --> 00:16:29.480 go out to my network and find other investors for the company, and that 196 00:16:29.480 --> 00:16:33.720 often takes a few weeks to put together. But usually it works out pretty well. 197 00:16:33.730 --> 00:16:38.820 There are a lot of folks out there who are inclined to take a more detailed 198 00:16:38.820 --> 00:16:44.790 look at something. Once a lead is in one, Price has agreed to and deals to, 199 00:16:44.800 --> 00:16:49.870 ah, lot faster. Once all of that has been put in place, that's a great 200 00:16:49.870 --> 00:16:55.220 process. It's great information for those listeners out there. And frankly, 201 00:16:55.220 --> 00:17:02.180 that's a pretty quick cycle. Like 47 weeks is lightning compared toa others 202 00:17:02.190 --> 00:17:06.460 that are out there, which is great. It doesn't need to take much longer than 203 00:17:06.460 --> 00:17:10.329 that. You know, if I shouldn't write, it really shouldn't. But you're right. 204 00:17:10.339 --> 00:17:13.770 Yeah, if I'm on the fence about something, it's probably something I 205 00:17:13.770 --> 00:17:19.849 just need. Thio politely thank the founders about and move on. And maybe 206 00:17:19.849 --> 00:17:23.089 that company is a little too early, and I end up looking at them again in six 207 00:17:23.089 --> 00:17:25.740 months when they have made some progress and getting really excited 208 00:17:25.740 --> 00:17:30.150 about it, then about 40% of the investments that I make fit that 209 00:17:30.150 --> 00:17:34.530 pattern where I meet them. There's not enough to go on yet at the moment that 210 00:17:34.530 --> 00:17:38.990 I meet them. But I like the founders. I am interested in the problem that they 211 00:17:38.990 --> 00:17:43.730 are solving, and I encourage them to stay in touch with me. And six months 212 00:17:43.730 --> 00:17:48.040 or nine months later, they've hired a few people. Some of the logos in their 213 00:17:48.040 --> 00:17:51.910 pipeline have turned into real customers. All of a sudden, there's 214 00:17:51.920 --> 00:17:57.110 something tangible for me to dig into and to research. And I can often make a 215 00:17:57.110 --> 00:18:01.540 decision very quickly in a situation like that where I've had the benefit of 216 00:18:01.550 --> 00:18:06.320 having met somebody in the past, and I can see over time the progress that 217 00:18:06.320 --> 00:18:10.640 they have made against the goals that they had when I first met them. So yeah, 218 00:18:10.650 --> 00:18:13.290 that's often how it works. And again, if you're if you're thinking about it. 219 00:18:13.290 --> 00:18:17.660 If you're not sure, you save the precious few slots that you have to 220 00:18:17.660 --> 00:18:21.510 invest in any given year in the year old. Invest in six or seven or eight 221 00:18:21.510 --> 00:18:25.650 companies. You save that for the ones that just like grip you, that just 222 00:18:25.650 --> 00:18:30.200 grippy by the throat and that you can't stop thinking about of the way you 223 00:18:30.200 --> 00:18:34.480 describe that. If you grip you by the throat, yeah, because you really can't 224 00:18:34.480 --> 00:18:38.270 get it off your mind, right? You're excited. You kind of feel it. You have 225 00:18:38.270 --> 00:18:42.020 a sense for it. Not only does the analysis start to add up, but you have 226 00:18:42.020 --> 00:18:47.870 a feel for it, right? And that's that z exciting stuff. So probably plenty of 227 00:18:47.870 --> 00:18:52.060 examples here. But what's a recent achievement that you're really proud of? 228 00:18:52.060 --> 00:18:55.210 Whether it waas, you know someone got acquired, whether it's growth or 229 00:18:55.210 --> 00:18:59.630 success, a new raise? Let's see. I mentioned my portfolio companies Spider 230 00:18:59.630 --> 00:19:04.590 Tech, which makes automated communication tools for police 231 00:19:04.590 --> 00:19:10.120 departments. And that company found itself in a very unusual and unexpected 232 00:19:10.120 --> 00:19:15.920 situation this year when a number of its early customers started using the 233 00:19:15.920 --> 00:19:20.620 product to communicate with citizens about Cove it in about the lockdowns 234 00:19:20.620 --> 00:19:24.840 that were happening in March and about the public health emergency that we 235 00:19:24.840 --> 00:19:31.100 were all facing and the product was not built with that kind of a use case ever 236 00:19:31.100 --> 00:19:34.850 in mind. But it turned out to be perfect for that. And it turned out 237 00:19:34.860 --> 00:19:40.760 that it helps customers police departments in a time of real need. And 238 00:19:41.050 --> 00:19:47.180 as a result of that, almost every police Department that was in spider 239 00:19:47.180 --> 00:19:53.060 text late stage pipeline in the spring of this year converted into a sale 240 00:19:53.070 --> 00:19:58.010 within a matter of weeks and telling the government as you know, some very 241 00:19:58.010 --> 00:20:02.350 long sales cycles. And there are people who have expectations and biases about 242 00:20:02.350 --> 00:20:07.260 that. But when something like that happens, all of that all of those 243 00:20:07.260 --> 00:20:11.500 concerns. All of those stereotypes about government sale cycles evaporate 244 00:20:11.510 --> 00:20:16.230 and police departments around the country bought spider tech in Mass in 245 00:20:16.230 --> 00:20:19.430 order to be able to communicate with their citizens. And it became an 246 00:20:19.430 --> 00:20:25.840 important public safety tool in a completely new E. What great timing. 247 00:20:25.840 --> 00:20:30.430 And you so no wonder you're proud of that because talk about being able to 248 00:20:30.430 --> 00:20:35.640 provide a public service, and it wasn't in it wasn't intended or designed that 249 00:20:35.640 --> 00:20:40.780 way, but they were able to figure it out, which that's just wonderful. So So 250 00:20:40.780 --> 00:20:45.060 I'll ask you an interesting one now. So what is something, Um, if you're 251 00:20:45.060 --> 00:20:50.480 thinking about founders of early stage companies that everyone should either 252 00:20:50.490 --> 00:20:57.400 start doing or stop doing, and you can pick any category you want there. When 253 00:20:57.400 --> 00:21:03.540 it comes to things that they shouldn't do, they shouldn't hire anyone to help 254 00:21:03.540 --> 00:21:08.660 them raise funding. That's perfectly appropriate to hire, you know, an 255 00:21:08.660 --> 00:21:12.860 investment banker or advisor or someone. If you are raising a $300 million 256 00:21:12.860 --> 00:21:18.260 private equity round or something like that, and for the fees that you will 257 00:21:18.260 --> 00:21:22.730 pay on a $300 million deal, you could get a very capable person stand firm to 258 00:21:22.730 --> 00:21:26.690 help you. I would submit that if you're raising $2 million and maybe paying a 259 00:21:26.690 --> 00:21:33.130 7% successfully for that, you might not be getting the world's top talent. And 260 00:21:33.140 --> 00:21:39.230 I think founders need to take on that process themselves. And I see too many 261 00:21:39.230 --> 00:21:46.040 people relying on third parties for access to capital. You don't need that. 262 00:21:46.040 --> 00:21:50.320 You can assemble a list of potential investors who are a good fit for you 263 00:21:50.330 --> 00:21:55.980 yourself, with a simple few hours of research on crunch base, and most good 264 00:21:55.980 --> 00:22:03.340 investors do read well written cold emails. I closed the deal yesterday. 265 00:22:03.350 --> 00:22:06.990 Not yesterday. Today's Friday a week ago. I closed the deal on Friday of 266 00:22:06.990 --> 00:22:13.190 last week that started with a cold email from the founder, and I led that 267 00:22:13.190 --> 00:22:18.220 seed round in the company. And the seed Rin was wildly oversubscribed. Maybe 268 00:22:18.220 --> 00:22:23.050 five or six X over subscribed. Everybody e wanted it on that deal, and 269 00:22:23.050 --> 00:22:27.220 that started with a cold email, and the next deal that I'm hopefully going to 270 00:22:27.220 --> 00:22:32.100 be the leading that could be closing in about a month also started with a cold 271 00:22:32.100 --> 00:22:37.950 email. Amazing other things to stop doing. Don't outsource your core 272 00:22:37.950 --> 00:22:42.700 functions. I would argue that, you know, it's perfectly fine to outsource your 273 00:22:42.700 --> 00:22:46.970 book keeping. You know, the bookkeeping for early stage software companies is 274 00:22:47.040 --> 00:22:52.470 pretty straightforward. Anyone who has done this and knows how to do air. Our 275 00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:56.190 subscription math can produce a good set of books for you don't need a CFO, 276 00:22:56.190 --> 00:22:59.740 you know, when I see a founding team and one of the founders is the CFO, I 277 00:22:59.740 --> 00:23:05.500 wonder, what does that person do all day, right. Not managing a finance 278 00:23:05.500 --> 00:23:13.840 department in the tiny company, and yet I also see companies that outsource the 279 00:23:13.840 --> 00:23:19.080 building of their technology to a Dev shop, and I have maximalist views 280 00:23:19.090 --> 00:23:23.630 against that. And what I mean by that is the very best thing that could 281 00:23:23.630 --> 00:23:28.030 happen. The very best thing that can happen when you hire a dev shop eyes 282 00:23:28.030 --> 00:23:30.880 also just about the worst thing that can happen and that is that they 283 00:23:30.880 --> 00:23:36.660 deliver the product to you on time, on budget and on spec, and people say, 284 00:23:36.660 --> 00:23:39.520 Well, that's that's a good thing. Is an Internet actually, that's a bad thing. 285 00:23:39.520 --> 00:23:44.470 And the reason that that's a bad thing is that when you get that, you then put 286 00:23:44.470 --> 00:23:48.680 it in the hands of your customers. And in almost every case of a of a 287 00:23:48.680 --> 00:23:53.340 successful software company that I have ever worked with, the customers end up 288 00:23:53.340 --> 00:24:00.060 using your products in a way that founder not anticipate right and that 289 00:24:00.340 --> 00:24:06.490 all emerging behavior often triggers an awareness of the need to completely 290 00:24:06.490 --> 00:24:11.670 reorient the product, to elevate features and capabilities that were 291 00:24:12.040 --> 00:24:19.150 thought incidental and to throw away or deprecate other products. Other aspects 292 00:24:19.150 --> 00:24:24.140 of the product that people thought were the core use case. When that happens, 293 00:24:24.140 --> 00:24:28.810 you often have a short window of time to react thio, the behavior that you're 294 00:24:28.810 --> 00:24:31.860 observing among your customers and the direct feedback that they're giving to 295 00:24:31.860 --> 00:24:36.670 you. And you need thio iterate quickly. You need to cycle quickly, and Deb 296 00:24:36.670 --> 00:24:40.310 shops just aren't capable of doing that. What, what what is capable of doing 297 00:24:40.310 --> 00:24:45.520 that is a small, highly productive founding team of developers and 298 00:24:45.520 --> 00:24:49.870 engineers who are on your payroll, who are direct employees of you who have 299 00:24:49.870 --> 00:24:54.790 stock options and meaningful ownership in your company and Dev. Shops don't do 300 00:24:54.790 --> 00:24:59.240 that. Deaf shops are very effective. If an insurance company wants to launch a 301 00:24:59.240 --> 00:25:05.050 mobile app or something like that, where the company is stable, the needs 302 00:25:05.050 --> 00:25:08.410 air clear. The technology risk isn't all that high. It's just a matter of 303 00:25:08.410 --> 00:25:13.450 getting it done. And it's a matter of it's a matter of fact that the customer 304 00:25:13.450 --> 00:25:16.320 doesn't have it software capabilities of their own because they're an 305 00:25:16.320 --> 00:25:20.970 insurance company. There's a role to play in a valuable service that those 306 00:25:20.970 --> 00:25:26.500 kinds of companies offer. But I don't think that they offer a valuable 307 00:25:26.500 --> 00:25:31.470 service for the earliest stage startups, and that that certainly makes a being a 308 00:25:31.470 --> 00:25:34.890 core function. Curious what your thoughts are about marketing agencies 309 00:25:34.890 --> 00:25:39.400 providing kind of outsourced support or the demand generation companies that 310 00:25:39.400 --> 00:25:43.870 are out there in an early stage scenario, it depends on the complexity 311 00:25:43.870 --> 00:25:49.750 of the product. If it's a relatively simple product that can simply be 312 00:25:49.760 --> 00:25:54.970 downloaded and installed in, the user can start working on it. Then that can 313 00:25:54.970 --> 00:26:01.650 work if it needs explanation, integration or data ingestion. It's 314 00:26:01.650 --> 00:26:07.130 very hard for an agency to be helpful with that at the earliest stage at 315 00:26:07.130 --> 00:26:10.970 getting from, you know, zero to a couple million dollars in annual 316 00:26:10.970 --> 00:26:15.810 recurring revenue. Almost all of my companies that have been successful at 317 00:26:15.810 --> 00:26:20.040 that figured out how to get to customers at scale on their own. 318 00:26:20.050 --> 00:26:26.030 Awesome. Some. Another question, then, about sort of the how cove it is 319 00:26:26.030 --> 00:26:30.880 impacting many startups. They're having to think through this whole notion of 320 00:26:30.880 --> 00:26:33.690 remote selling. No one's getting on planes. No one's doing face to face 321 00:26:33.690 --> 00:26:38.630 meetings anymore. How have you noticed that start up teams that you're working 322 00:26:38.630 --> 00:26:42.940 with are managing without face to face? And without that interaction, I'll tell 323 00:26:42.940 --> 00:26:46.710 you something that surprised me That, but that I have now heard from multiple 324 00:26:46.710 --> 00:26:51.030 companies in my portfolio is that they're having to re sell their product 325 00:26:51.030 --> 00:26:55.600 to their existing customers because a lot of their customers have been under 326 00:26:55.600 --> 00:27:00.880 so much stress in their own businesses that they have had to go through 327 00:27:00.880 --> 00:27:05.530 layoffs and reductions in force, such that everyone who bought the product a 328 00:27:05.530 --> 00:27:10.280 year ago is no longer with the company. Ah, lot of execs are gone, a lot of 329 00:27:10.280 --> 00:27:16.090 major purchasers are gone, and I have multiple portfolio companies that are 330 00:27:16.090 --> 00:27:21.540 charging customers monthly where the person who authorized the purchase is 331 00:27:21.540 --> 00:27:26.860 no longer on the payroll of the company and where the my my software startups 332 00:27:26.870 --> 00:27:33.490 are scrambling to build new relationships with existing customers 333 00:27:33.490 --> 00:27:38.860 so that when renewals come up that they are not turning, That's a really, uh, 334 00:27:39.240 --> 00:27:44.610 unusual circumstance right now. Maybe not so unusual everyone. It appears to 335 00:27:44.610 --> 00:27:47.490 me that everyone that I've been talking to that has any customer base has been 336 00:27:47.490 --> 00:27:52.080 focused on customer success, meaning get back. And if you're not already, 337 00:27:52.090 --> 00:27:55.870 get back in front of that customer and make sure that they're they're 338 00:27:55.870 --> 00:28:01.540 achieving impact and value regularly. And if you're doing that, you discover 339 00:28:01.540 --> 00:28:05.850 along the way I think what you mentioned, which is bodies are going to 340 00:28:05.850 --> 00:28:08.220 change. They're gonna be layoffs. They're gonna be shifts. They're gonna 341 00:28:08.220 --> 00:28:12.220 be organizations. Um, they're gonna be cutbacks. Um, they're gonna be budget 342 00:28:12.220 --> 00:28:18.440 slashes. And so unless your core essential to that business, it's gonna 343 00:28:18.440 --> 00:28:24.020 be tough justified. And part of that is reselling. That's a and that's a tough 344 00:28:24.020 --> 00:28:29.600 thing for sure, it's even tougher because it's not face to face. Exactly. 345 00:28:29.600 --> 00:28:33.450 And and with everything not being face to face, especially for high ticket 346 00:28:33.450 --> 00:28:40.510 software, a lot of the steps that sales teams are accustomed to going through 347 00:28:40.520 --> 00:28:46.950 in their sales motions are having to be rethought and adjusted. And so 348 00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:53.300 pilots are different than they used to be. In terms of timelines, deployments 349 00:28:53.300 --> 00:28:57.190 and integrations are different. Contracting and budgeting are different, 350 00:28:57.200 --> 00:29:01.900 and a lot of buyers have had to adjust their processes to get comfortable 351 00:29:01.900 --> 00:29:05.750 paying often six figures buying software from companies where they have 352 00:29:05.750 --> 00:29:08.770 not met anyone in person, where they have not gone through their traditional 353 00:29:09.140 --> 00:29:13.590 purchasing checklists, and where they're having to adapt all of that 354 00:29:13.600 --> 00:29:18.460 online for the first time. What I have seen that distinguishes companies that 355 00:29:18.460 --> 00:29:23.790 are making that transition successfully is that they're investing into digital 356 00:29:23.790 --> 00:29:30.480 assets and into content marketing in order to help their champions inside 357 00:29:30.490 --> 00:29:35.340 their customer organizations make the sale on their behalf internally to 358 00:29:35.350 --> 00:29:40.260 other buyers into gatekeepers within the company. And so you need really 359 00:29:40.260 --> 00:29:45.710 well documented contracts, often with some sort of explanation of things you 360 00:29:45.710 --> 00:29:50.680 know, using simple Loom videos to explain things in M s A. Agreements so 361 00:29:50.680 --> 00:29:55.450 that your buyer can take that to the legal department and show them this is 362 00:29:55.450 --> 00:29:59.620 why the contract is this way, uh, investing more into content marketing 363 00:29:59.620 --> 00:30:03.190 so that they can so that a buyer could go to their boss and say, Here's a 364 00:30:03.190 --> 00:30:06.410 three minute video about why we need this product and why it's important. 365 00:30:06.410 --> 00:30:09.710 And here's a case study about how another customer is using it. Those 366 00:30:09.710 --> 00:30:14.490 kinds of tools and collateral have always been important when it comes to 367 00:30:14.490 --> 00:30:19.460 selling software. But when they become your only tools, you have to invest 368 00:30:19.470 --> 00:30:23.510 even more into them and get them even more right than you did before. I heard 369 00:30:23.510 --> 00:30:28.450 a marketer using an interesting term Ah, success bridge, right? You've used a 370 00:30:28.450 --> 00:30:32.200 certain milestone. You're trying to get that person or that organization to the 371 00:30:32.200 --> 00:30:37.110 next milestone or the next step in the relationship. And if you can identify 372 00:30:37.110 --> 00:30:41.220 what are the challenges they face internally, build some form of success 373 00:30:41.220 --> 00:30:46.730 bridge to enable them? Thio more easily migrate to that next step. I think it's 374 00:30:46.740 --> 00:30:50.410 and that's done typically through content, because it's typically that 375 00:30:50.420 --> 00:30:54.130 those things that are happening, the background or asynchronous you're not 376 00:30:54.140 --> 00:30:58.400 part of those meetings. You're not part of that discussion, that analysis. So 377 00:30:58.400 --> 00:31:02.570 it's necessary that you try and support them in any way possible. It's 378 00:31:02.570 --> 00:31:07.120 typically with content. Yeah, and success. Bridges are a great term for 379 00:31:07.120 --> 00:31:12.060 that. And one of the most effective types of success bridge that a software 380 00:31:12.060 --> 00:31:18.070 company can build is eliminating steps, eliminating steps in the deployment of 381 00:31:18.070 --> 00:31:24.490 a product and a customer getting its first value out of a product and 382 00:31:24.490 --> 00:31:29.440 eliminating steps in the sale of the product and eliminating steps in 383 00:31:29.450 --> 00:31:35.660 spreading the product throughout an organization. And the companies that 384 00:31:35.660 --> 00:31:39.390 have adapted best to covert are the ones who have looked at every single 385 00:31:39.400 --> 00:31:46.390 aspect of their product of their sales motion of everything and taken out the 386 00:31:46.390 --> 00:31:52.560 steps that are not necessary. Thio get the customers value earlier and so true, 387 00:31:52.940 --> 00:31:57.610 and it got me wondering about your investing. It's such an early stage. 388 00:31:57.620 --> 00:32:02.710 Have you seen any of your portfolio companies go through a significant 389 00:32:02.720 --> 00:32:09.270 pivot as they were working through the early stages that they're in? So I you 390 00:32:09.270 --> 00:32:12.490 know, I'm a seed investor. I usually invest in companies that are a year old 391 00:32:12.490 --> 00:32:17.370 and that have fewer than 10 employees and zero or often just a few $100,000 392 00:32:17.380 --> 00:32:22.480 in revenue. At the time that I invest, 100% of the companies that I have ever 393 00:32:22.480 --> 00:32:28.700 invested in have pivoted substantially and seriously before I invested in 394 00:32:28.700 --> 00:32:33.150 there. See ground, every single one does it. You know, Mike Tyson said that 395 00:32:33.150 --> 00:32:36.820 everybody's got a plan until they get punched in the mouth. And I think about 396 00:32:36.820 --> 00:32:42.470 that in ah lot in terms of people's assumptions about their product and 397 00:32:42.480 --> 00:32:46.580 assumptions about their technology and their market. And even in the earliest 398 00:32:46.580 --> 00:32:52.220 stages, you have to pivot, and you have to react to what your customers air 399 00:32:52.220 --> 00:32:56.450 telling you. And so I cannot think of a company that has not pivoted that I 400 00:32:56.450 --> 00:33:00.040 haven't invested in that did not pivot before I invested them. Every single 401 00:33:00.040 --> 00:33:05.850 one has. Every single one has done so. Meaningful numbers of time, times after 402 00:33:05.850 --> 00:33:10.210 I invested and the ones that move quickest to make those decisions most 403 00:33:10.210 --> 00:33:16.210 effectively are the ones that do the best. So 11 or two final questions. So 404 00:33:16.220 --> 00:33:20.460 are there any you've probably seen enough of them talking to the number of 405 00:33:20.470 --> 00:33:24.950 early stage startups? What are the landmines that they step on? The 406 00:33:24.960 --> 00:33:28.960 threatened their existence that you might suggest, Hey, avoid that if it 407 00:33:28.960 --> 00:33:31.550 all possible or anything that people are doing out there that you've seen. 408 00:33:31.940 --> 00:33:37.040 There are so many because the default state of a new technology company is 409 00:33:37.040 --> 00:33:43.830 dead and the attrition rates are so high, just as a to put some numbers 410 00:33:43.830 --> 00:33:48.230 around that I recently was looking through my startup database of all of 411 00:33:48.230 --> 00:33:52.940 the companies that pitched me and I looked at the 2016 cohort. I looked at 412 00:33:52.940 --> 00:33:58.070 the court of companies that pitched me four years ago, and I wanted to see 413 00:33:58.070 --> 00:34:01.390 which ones are still around. And what are the outcomes for the ones that are 414 00:34:01.390 --> 00:34:07.790 not still around? And these air rough estimates. But they're directionally 415 00:34:07.790 --> 00:34:13.020 correct, I would say 90% of the companies that pitched me in 2016 are 416 00:34:13.020 --> 00:34:19.590 no longer around and did not have a good outcome. But roughly 90% about 3% 417 00:34:19.600 --> 00:34:25.020 did not receive any institutional funding that I can identify, but have 418 00:34:25.060 --> 00:34:31.820 managed to grow in the absence of funding and build successful businesses 419 00:34:31.820 --> 00:34:35.420 where they're active and serving customers. And they are employing a lot 420 00:34:35.420 --> 00:34:40.719 of people in doing well. About 3% have had some kind of an acquisition 421 00:34:40.730 --> 00:34:46.139 subsequent to 2016. That looks like it was a good outcome for everybody 422 00:34:46.139 --> 00:34:49.870 involved. That might be, for example, a company getting a million dollars of 423 00:34:49.870 --> 00:34:53.960 investment and then selling for $25 million. Like the investors probably 424 00:34:53.960 --> 00:34:58.060 made money. The founders probably made money. The employee stock options 425 00:34:58.060 --> 00:35:02.010 probably ended up being valuable for everybody involved with the deal like 426 00:35:02.010 --> 00:35:08.190 that. And about 3% of the companies appear to have raised venture capital 427 00:35:08.200 --> 00:35:13.500 from other firms and are still in business and doing well. And then, you 428 00:35:13.500 --> 00:35:16.580 know, that's the company that pitched me just four years ago. That was not 429 00:35:16.590 --> 00:35:21.650 all that long ago, and yet very few raise venture funding. Very few are 430 00:35:21.660 --> 00:35:26.720 still around today, And that's just the nature of investing in startups and 431 00:35:26.730 --> 00:35:30.890 starting startups that air pre product market fit The attrition rate is very 432 00:35:30.890 --> 00:35:34.580 high. You know, you can think about those David Attenborough nature videos 433 00:35:34.580 --> 00:35:41.070 where you see a turtle laying eggs on the beach and, uh, the turtles hatch 434 00:35:41.070 --> 00:35:45.750 and they have to make their mad dash from the beach down. Thio the ocean 435 00:35:45.750 --> 00:35:50.610 while they're being attacked by birds and snakes and every creature under the 436 00:35:50.610 --> 00:35:54.990 sun that wants a quick meal. And startups are kind of like those poor 437 00:35:54.990 --> 00:36:00.700 turtles making the poor dash to the water so true. And what great insights? 438 00:36:00.710 --> 00:36:06.320 Because there are plenty of companies out there early stage that I hear from 439 00:36:06.320 --> 00:36:10.970 often that air listening that that want advice. And so, gosh, what a great 440 00:36:10.970 --> 00:36:14.520 resource. So this has has been great to learn about you. It's been great to 441 00:36:14.520 --> 00:36:19.650 learn about your work at stage, and I just wish you continued success with 442 00:36:19.650 --> 00:36:22.490 what you're doing. I think it's a great thing, thank you very much. It was 443 00:36:22.490 --> 00:36:27.060 great to be here, Alex. Tell us what's the best way to connect with you? If 444 00:36:27.060 --> 00:36:31.530 there's interest in reaching out. Yeah, so people can follow me on Twitter. My 445 00:36:31.540 --> 00:36:37.840 firm account of Stage VP and my personal account is at the Alex 446 00:36:37.840 --> 00:36:43.140 Rubalcaba and for founders who want to get in touch with me. The very best way, 447 00:36:43.140 --> 00:36:48.110 of course, is to find someone who knows me like an existing founder to make an 448 00:36:48.110 --> 00:36:51.620 intro. The reason that that it's so valuable is because people who know me 449 00:36:51.620 --> 00:36:55.580 what I invested will often know whether you are a good fit for me and can't 450 00:36:55.580 --> 00:36:58.780 give you advice and say, You know what? You're not the kind of company Alex 451 00:36:58.790 --> 00:37:01.700 likes. You know, you're you're doing something in cannabis, and Alex doesn't 452 00:37:01.700 --> 00:37:05.930 invest in cannabis. Or you should pitch this other venture firm. You know, 453 00:37:05.940 --> 00:37:10.640 don't pitch Alex. You know, we'd stuff go pitch new dog. And so that's one of 454 00:37:10.640 --> 00:37:15.500 the reasons why referrals are valuable because it saves the founders time and 455 00:37:15.510 --> 00:37:20.890 the investors, and it worked. It enables better matches on then, if you 456 00:37:20.890 --> 00:37:24.460 know you don't have an introductory path to me, a really well crafted cold 457 00:37:24.460 --> 00:37:29.210 email does get my attention, and it does lead to build Thio. Two deals 458 00:37:29.210 --> 00:37:33.860 getting done as the deal that happened just last week is great evidence of 459 00:37:34.230 --> 00:37:39.970 that's fantastic, and we'll certainly take your advice there. So thanks to 460 00:37:39.970 --> 00:37:43.590 everyone for listening to this episode of the revenue Siris on the B two B 461 00:37:43.600 --> 00:37:47.870 growth show, I'm your host John Grisman, founder and sales coach at Early 462 00:37:47.870 --> 00:37:50.550 Revenue. Until next time I'm out. 463 00:37:53.530 --> 00:37:57.370 Are you an early stage tech founder that's frustrated by limited sales? Do 464 00:37:57.370 --> 00:38:00.590 you like the time to dedicate to a traditional sales training program? 465 00:38:00.600 --> 00:38:04.380 John Crispin's early revenue sales program helps early stage founders 466 00:38:04.390 --> 00:38:08.170 accelerate sales. In large accounts, he's built a playbook that transfers 467 00:38:08.170 --> 00:38:11.590 what he's learned as a founder and sales later into a condensed, easy to 468 00:38:11.590 --> 00:38:15.290 implement program. If you're ready to increase your start of sales capacity, 469 00:38:15.330 --> 00:38:18.660 visit early revenue dot com to get started today.